HTML Template Systems

[Billy Donahue <bi...@dadadada.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> > "G.W. Haywood" wrote:
> > > > > GWH> Do you think this one could go off-List now?
> > > > No; I find it quite useful to help form my own descision
> > > OK, you win, I'm outvoted.
> > 
> > I will say that the topic has greatly veered from the original subject.
> > How about we continue the discussion with appropriate subject lines?
> 
> [OT] ?

We're still talking about mod_perl.  This is stuff we use all the time.
I'd say that it's very much ON topic.  Maybe we'll use [OT] and say that
it means "on topic".  I think a lot of people are getting started here
and the discussion is helpful.  I also think that these discussions are
going to make a better comparison guide.


- --
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Billy Donahue <ma...@dadadada.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE5tS60+2VvpwIZdF0RAiFMAJ9SB6tPEDnIm60SRHBZ1a2og+ZLpQCfbmmO
LB9oyYjveekW2z394O1YHBM=
=rJBX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: HTML Template Systems

["G.W. Haywood" <ge...@www.jubileegroup.co.uk>]

Hi all,

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Billy Donahue wrote:

> > [OT] ?
> 
> We're still talking about mod_perl.

I hadn't noticed that, but like I said, the majority wins.  There's
been enough noise on this thread without me adding to it.

73,
Ged.