You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> on 2011/01/21 07:10:15 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site:
docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml
docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf
dtdx/document-v20.pdf
> -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>
> -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>
> -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>
...
Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here. Also I think
there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
have to search for that discussion later.
-Brian
input.projectInfo update (was Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in
/forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss
docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html
dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20.pdf)
Posted by Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 05:32:52PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Brian M Dube wrote:
> > > -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> > > +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>
> >
> > > -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> > > +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> >
> > > -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> > > +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>
> >
> > > -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> > > +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here.
>
> I was wondering about that. This is in the projectInfo plugin.
> Perhaps use the release version number instead.
In r1062562, sections now have an explicit @id built from @context and
@version.
-Brian
> -David
Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in /forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20.pdf
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Brian M Dube wrote:
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> > +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>
>
> ...
>
> Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here.
I was wondering about that. This is in the projectInfo plugin.
Perhaps use the release version number instead.
> Also I think
> there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
> have to search for that discussion later.
Yes, that would be good.
-David
Plus signs in a/@name (was Re: svn commit: r1061643 - in
/forrest/site: docs_0_90/changes.html docs_0_90/changes.rss
docs_0_90/changes.xml docs_0_90/skins.html docs_0_90/upgrading_09.html
dtdx/document-v13.pdf dtdx/document-v20.pdf)
Posted by Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:10:15PM -0800, Brian M Dube wrote:
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N1034C">Changes to Build</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Build-N10355">Changes to Build</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N10356">Changes to the Code Base</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+the+Code+Base-N1035F">Changes to the Code Base</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106D3">Changes to Documentation</a>
> > +<a href="#Changes+to+Documentation-N106DC">Changes to Documentation</a>
>
> > -<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N10875">Contributors to this release</a>
> > +<a href="#Contributors+to+this+release-N1087E">Contributors to this release</a>
>
> ...
>
> Perhaps a change similar to r1061144 should happen here. Also I think
> there is discussion about '+' being invalid in these attributes. I'll
> have to search for that discussion later.
I'm not finding that discussion. The '+' is allowed in places like
a/@name for HTML 4.01 Transitional, but not in XHTML 1.0 Strict. I
think that is what I was remembering.
-Brian