You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Eric Newton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/07/17 21:39:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1578) Connector constructor doesn't need to fail-fast (maybe?)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13711527#comment-13711527 ] 

Eric Newton commented on ACCUMULO-1578:
---------------------------------------

+1

I've run into this behavior being a problem in the past.  For example, making a connector while accumulo was down.
                
> Connector constructor doesn't need to fail-fast (maybe?)
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1578
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1578
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Christopher Tubbs
>            Assignee: Christopher Tubbs
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.25h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> Currently, when one instantiates a Connector from an Instance, with one's username and token, the Connector actually tries to reach out and authenticate those credentials, to provide early failure.
> Because this has some overhead, we explicitly check for the condition that the user is a system user (a tserver or the monitor, etc.), so that we don't fail early in these conditions (because we don't expect the system to be poorly configured or running in a bad state, such that it doesn't authenticate... and we don't care about causing an inconvenience to unauthorized servers by failing late).
> After some thought, I'm not sure that we should continue to fail fast. I'm not sure that it provides sufficient convenience for users to warrant the additional RPC calls. Besides, there's no guarantee, especially with the new pluggable authentication introduced in 1.5.0, that the credentials will still be valid later, even if the user were able to authenticate initially.
> As such, I propose we drop this check, and rely on authentication failures later (when work is actually initiated).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira