You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Vladimir Sitnikov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/09/18 07:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-6010) RelRule.Config requires too much ceremony for trivial cases

Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-6010:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: RelRule.Config requires too much ceremony for trivial cases
                 Key: CALCITE-6010
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6010
             Project: Calcite
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: core
            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov


It takes a lot to implement RelRule.Config even for trivial cases when no extra configuration options needed.

Sample:

https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/d9dd3ac8a9f695e111a0a5e77f45b61b90f4b5b6/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/TableScanRule.java#L72C35-L78

It requires users:
1) Use immutables or implement Config manually. Adding immutables processor adds compile-time overhead, and implementing the interface manually is not trivial
2) Implement CustomRule(Config) constructor
3) Implement Config.toRule() by calling CustomRule(Config)

---

I suggest:
1) Drop method Config.toRule(), and suggest users to call new ...Rule(config) directly.
2) Provide default Config implementation along with Calcite. For instance DefaultConfig.EMPTY, DefaultConfigBuilder...
3) Use composition for custom configurations, in other words, let custom rules have their own attributes, and one of the attributes could be default config.
For instance: {{data class AggregateExpandDistinctAggregatesRule.Config(config RelRule.Config, usingGroupingSets Boolean)}}

It would make it easier for users to implement config objects, and it would reduce the code size (generated bytecode and native image size) as the current Calcite approach duplicates the same "Config" methods like withOperandSupplier across all the Config implementations 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)