You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Stamatis Zampetakis (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/31 11:28:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4561) Wrong results for plan with
EnumerableHashJoin (semi) on nullable colunms
Stamatis Zampetakis created CALCITE-4561:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: Wrong results for plan with EnumerableHashJoin (semi) on nullable colunms
Key: CALCITE-4561
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4561
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.27.0
Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
When the query plan contains an {{EnumerableHashJoin}} with type {{SEMI}} over nullable columns the results are wrong since the operator incorrectly considers {{NULL=NULL}} as {{TRUE}} instead of {{UNKNOWN}}/{{FALSE}}.
The problem can be reproduced by putting the following test in {{EnumerableHashJoinTest}}.
{noformat}
@Test void semiJoinWithNulls() {
tester(false, new JdbcTest.HrSchema())
.query(
"SELECT e1.name FROM emps e1 WHERE e1.commission in (SELECT e2.commission FROM emps e2)")
.explainContains("EnumerableCalc(expr#0..1=[{inputs}], name=[$t0])\n"
+ " EnumerableHashJoin(condition=[=($1, $6)], joinType=[semi])\n"
+ " EnumerableCalc(expr#0..4=[{inputs}], name=[$t2], commission=[$t4])\n"
+ " EnumerableTableScan(table=[[s, emps]])\n"
+ " EnumerableTableScan(table=[[s, emps]])\n\n")
.returnsUnordered(
"name=Bill",
"name=Eric",
"name=Theodore");
}
{noformat}
At the moment 'Sebastian' (with commission NULL) is wrongly included in the result set.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)