You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@olingo.apache.org by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com> on 2013/12/02 08:38:58 UTC
Feature: Annotation for EDM definition
Hi,
regarding to the Annotations for EDM definition
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32) I have two question.
First WDYT should the "odata-api" and the "odata-api-annotation² decoupled
(no dependency between them)? See discussion in comments here[1] and
here[2].
Second I would prefer to merge the PocEdmAnnotationExtension feature branch
into the master branch and include it into the next (1.1.0) release. Are
there any objections against this?
Kind regards,
Michael
[1]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32?focusedCommentId=13835966&pa
ge=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-
13835966
[2]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32?focusedCommentId=13836313&pa
ge=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-
13836313
Re: Feature: Annotation for EDM definition
Posted by "Bolz, Michael" <mi...@sap.com>.
Hi,
Last Monday I asked about "objections against the PocEdmAnnotationExtension
feature merge into the master branch² (see mail below).
Based on the fact that nobody wrote any objections against it I start with
the merge tomorrow.
As short conclusion about the feature and the merge:
The feature/extension has its own (maven) sub modules and only additions in
the ³api-annotations² module so there should be no regressions to existing
applications.
The only change is in the JPA processor which should be extended to support
the additions in the ³api-annotations² so that currently redundant (java)
annotations can be removed in a further release.
For more information see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32
Kind regards,
Michael
From: SAP SAP <mi...@sap.com>
Reply-To: <de...@olingo.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Monday 2 December 2013 08:38
To: "dev@olingo.incubator.apache.org" <de...@olingo.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Feature: Annotation for EDM definition
Hi,
regarding to the Annotations for EDM definition
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32) I have two question.
First WDYT should the "odata-api" and the "odata-api-annotation² decoupled
(no dependency between them)? See discussion in comments here[1] and
here[2].
Second I would prefer to merge the PocEdmAnnotationExtension feature branch
into the master branch and include it into the next (1.1.0) release. Are
there any objections against this?
Kind regards,
Michael
[1]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32?focusedCommentId=13835966&pa
ge=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-
13835966
[2]:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32?focusedCommentId=13836313&pa
ge=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-
13836313