You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@directory.apache.org by sm...@apache.org on 2016/12/31 18:08:54 UTC

svn commit: r1776810 - /directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext

Author: smckinney
Date: Sat Dec 31 18:08:54 2016
New Revision: 1776810

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776810&view=rev
Log:
fix broken link

Modified:
    directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext

Modified: directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext?rev=1776810&r1=1776809&r2=1776810&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext (original)
+++ directory/site/trunk/content/api/user-guide/1.3-apache-ldap-api-rational.mdtext Sat Dec 31 18:08:54 2016
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Notice: Licensed to the Apache Software
 When contemplating creating a new Java API for **LDAP** usage, we needed to consider whether this is a duplication of effort, as there were already in existence a number of libraries. For example:
 
 * **JNDI** : the default **JDK** **API**
-* **Netscape** (a.k.a Mozilla) [LdapSdk](http://www.mozilla.org/directory/javasdk.html)
+* **Netscape** (a.k.a Mozilla) [LdapSdk](http://www-archive.mozilla.org/directory/javasdk.html)
 * **OpenLDAP** [JLdap](http://www.openldap.org/jldap/)
 
 So what makes the development of our new *LDAP JAVA API* a valid effort and not another example of the **[NIH](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here)** syndrome?