You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com> on 2020/05/30 09:03:36 UTC

[VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :)
Following the discussion
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E

I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.

The naming conventions we vote on are as follows

[1] S3ToHiveOperator
[2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
[3] S3ToHiveTransfer
[4] We do not care about consistency

Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].

J.


-- 
Jarek Potiuk
Polidea | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>.
The vote has now passed with the option [1] winning:

[1] XToYOperator -> for example S3ToHiveOperator

We have 9 '+1' binding votes  :


   - Jarek Potiuk
   - Ash Berlin Taylor
   - Bas Harenslak
   - Tomasz Urbaszek
   - Kaxil Naik
   - Felix Uellendall
   - Maxime Beauchemin
   - Arthur Wiedmer
   - Kamil Breguła


We are waiting for the package voting to complete:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3514ef575b437b9eb368111b1e4b03ad7455e63d64c359c22fd6ea9a%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
to make the final move before we will implement the changes and re-cut RC4
for Backport Packages.

Issue created:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9101

J.


On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:57 AM Kamil Breguła <ka...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> +1 for [1] XToYOperator
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:56 AM Arthur Wiedmer <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for option 1 as well
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy
> :)
> > > Following the discussion
> > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> > > operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> > > 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> > > advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> > >
> > > The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> > >
> > > [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> > > [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> > > [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> > > [4] We do not care about consistency
> > >
> > > Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jarek Potiuk
> > > Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> > >
> > > M: +48 660 796 129
> > >
>


-- 
[image: image.jpeg]


Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: image.png]


<https://www.polidea.com/>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Kamil Breguła <ka...@polidea.com>.
+1 for [1] XToYOperator

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:56 AM Arthur Wiedmer <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for option 1 as well
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :)
> > Following the discussion
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> >
> > I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> > operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> > 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> > advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> >
> > The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> >
> > [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> > [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> > [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> > [4] We do not care about consistency
> >
> > Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jarek Potiuk
> > Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> >
> > M: +48 660 796 129
> >

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Arthur Wiedmer <ar...@gmail.com>.
+1 for option 1 as well

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :)
> Following the discussion
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>
> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
>
> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
>
> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> [4] We do not care about consistency
>
> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
>
> J.
>
>
> --
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129
>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Maxime Beauchemin <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for [1] XToYOperator

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 7:33 AM Felix Uellendall <fe...@pm.me.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 for [1] XToYOperator
>
> Best Regards,
> Felix
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for [1] XToYOperator
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for XToYOperator
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak
> >> <ba...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> > #1 -> XToYOperator
> >> >
> >> > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator
> >> > >
> >> > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much
> controversy
> >> > :)
> >> > >> Following the discussion
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> >> > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of
> June,
> >> > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members
> are
> >> > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> >> > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> >> > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> >> > >> [4] We do not care about consistency
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> >> > >>
> >> > >> J.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Jarek Potiuk
> >> > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> >> > >>
> >> > >> M: +48 660 796 129
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Felix Uellendall <fe...@pm.me.INVALID>.
+1 for [1] XToYOperator

Best Regards,
Felix

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for [1] XToYOperator
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 for XToYOperator
>>
>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak
>> <ba...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > #1 -> XToYOperator
>> >
>> > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator
>> > >
>> > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy
>> > :)
>> > >> Following the discussion
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>> > >>
>> > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
>> > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
>> > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
>> > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
>> > >>
>> > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
>> > >>
>> > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
>> > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
>> > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
>> > >> [4] We do not care about consistency
>> > >>
>> > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
>> > >>
>> > >> J.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Jarek Potiuk
>> > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
>> > >>
>> > >> M: +48 660 796 129
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1 for [1] XToYOperator

On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for XToYOperator
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak
> <ba...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > #1 -> XToYOperator
> >
> > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator
> > >
> > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy
> > :)
> > >> Following the discussion
> > >>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > >>
> > >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> > >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> > >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> > >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> > >>
> > >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> > >>
> > >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> > >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> > >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> > >> [4] We do not care about consistency
> > >>
> > >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> > >>
> > >> J.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jarek Potiuk
> > >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> > >>
> > >> M: +48 660 796 129
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>.
+1 for XToYOperator

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak
<ba...@godatadriven.com.invalid> wrote:

> #1 -> XToYOperator
>
> > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for [1] XToYOperator
> >
> > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy
> :)
> >> Following the discussion
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> >> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> >> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> >> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> >>
> >> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> >>
> >> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> >> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> >> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> >> [4] We do not care about consistency
> >>
> >> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> >>
> >> J.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jarek Potiuk
> >> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> >>
> >> M: +48 660 796 129
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Bas Harenslak <ba...@godatadriven.com.INVALID>.
#1 -> XToYOperator

> On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 for [1] XToYOperator
> 
> On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com> wrote:
> 
>> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :)
>> Following the discussion
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>> 
>> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
>> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
>> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
>> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
>> 
>> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
>> 
>> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
>> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
>> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
>> [4] We do not care about consistency
>> 
>> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jarek Potiuk
>> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
>> 
>> M: +48 660 796 129
>>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
+1 for [1] XToYOperator

On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com> wrote:

> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :)
> Following the discussion
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> 
> I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer
> operators. The vote will last for 72 hours - till Tuesday 2nd of June,
> 11 am CEST. Committers have binding votes, but community members are
> advised to vote with non-binding votes as well.
> 
> The naming conventions we vote on are as follows
> 
> [1] S3ToHiveOperator
> [2] S3ToHiveTransferOperator
> [3] S3ToHiveTransfer
> [4] We do not care about consistency
> 
> Consider this as my (binding) vote for [1].
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
> 
> M: +48 660 796 129
>