You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/07/02 07:46:54 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20360] -
stcheckout Unable to find root folder When Using a Label
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360
stcheckout Unable to find root folder When Using a Label
------- Additional Comments From jgraham@metlife.com 2003-07-02 05:46 -------
Line 481 in the 1.5.3 code is the check for starteamrootfolder == null (not a
catch from ST API block), so the behavior is eas(y|ier) to change. But (even
though I could use similar behavior in TreeBasedTask) I'm not sure the options
presented are ideal (i.e. why would the behavior of not finding a ViewLabel be
any different than not finding an explicitly specified Folder). Perhaps the
most ideal solution is to get includes/excludes to work more like fileset (or
at least include simple folder matching/globbing). I have an idea how
something like that would work but a) i'm having trouble seeing backwards
compatability effects (from both an includes/excludes and ST API perspective)
and b) given the scope of such a change, would it make sense to attempt it
against the current HEAD???
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org