You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com> on 2007/10/30 02:52:15 UTC
form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that has a
form= that disagrees with the schema default.
Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I just
tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged.
RE: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
At this point, I think that a JIRA would say,
'Enhance the type_test system to allow for both qualified and
unqualified default element forms, and then add test cases for various
uses of the form= property of XML schema, and then see if there are
bugs.'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bozhong Lin [mailto:bozhong.lin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 12:46 AM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
>
> Is there any JIRA created for this issue? If not, I can go ahead and
> created
> one.
>
> Thanks,
> Bo
>
> On 10/31/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At
least in
> > > the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control
the
> > > form, only the namespace.
> >
> > That's kind of the point. If @XmlElement is not there or if the
> > namespace attribute is unspecified, it uses the namespace
information
> > from the package-info which is should be whatever from the default
is
> > for the schema.
> >
> > If the element in the schema has a "form" that doesn't match the
default,
> > jaxb will output either:
> >
> > 1) @XmlElement(namespace = "") (unqualified)
> > 2) @XmlElement(namespace = "http://blah.blah.blah") (qualified,
> namespace
> > will match the schema namespace)
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM
> > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Cc: Benson Margulies
> > > > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it
> > >
> > > outputs
> > >
> > > > the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute.
> > > > If
> > >
> > > it
> > >
> > > > does agree, it doesn't.
> > > >
> > > > Something like that at least.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > > >
> > > > On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > > > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element
that
> > >
> > > has
> > >
> > > > > a form= that disagrees with the schema default.
> > > > >
> > > > > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema?
I
> > >
> > > just
> > >
> > > > > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error
emerged.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > J. Daniel Kulp
> > > > Principal Engineer
> > > > IONA
> > > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > > > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bo...@gmail.com>.
Is there any JIRA created for this issue? If not, I can go ahead and created
one.
Thanks,
Bo
On 10/31/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At least in
> > the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control the
> > form, only the namespace.
>
> That's kind of the point. If @XmlElement is not there or if the
> namespace attribute is unspecified, it uses the namespace information
> from the package-info which is should be whatever from the default is
> for the schema.
>
> If the element in the schema has a "form" that doesn't match the default,
> jaxb will output either:
>
> 1) @XmlElement(namespace = "") (unqualified)
> 2) @XmlElement(namespace = "http://blah.blah.blah") (qualified, namespace
> will match the schema namespace)
>
> Dan
>
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM
> > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Cc: Benson Margulies
> > > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it
> >
> > outputs
> >
> > > the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute.
> > > If
> >
> > it
> >
> > > does agree, it doesn't.
> > >
> > > Something like that at least.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that
> >
> > has
> >
> > > > a form= that disagrees with the schema default.
> > > >
> > > > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I
> >
> > just
> >
> > > > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged.
> > >
> > > --
> > > J. Daniel Kulp
> > > Principal Engineer
> > > IONA
> > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At least in
> the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control the
> form, only the namespace.
That's kind of the point. If @XmlElement is not there or if the
namespace attribute is unspecified, it uses the namespace information
from the package-info which is should be whatever from the default is
for the schema.
If the element in the schema has a "form" that doesn't match the default,
jaxb will output either:
1) @XmlElement(namespace = "") (unqualified)
2) @XmlElement(namespace = "http://blah.blah.blah") (qualified, namespace
will match the schema namespace)
Dan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM
> > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Benson Margulies
> > Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
> >
> >
> > Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it
>
> outputs
>
> > the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute.
> > If
>
> it
>
> > does agree, it doesn't.
> >
> > Something like that at least.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that
>
> has
>
> > > a form= that disagrees with the schema default.
> > >
> > > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I
>
> just
>
> > > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged.
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
RE: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
I don't see how the @XmlElement annotation can do the job. At least in
the version of JAXB we have in 2.0.3, @XmlElement can't control the
form, only the namespace.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:10 PM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
>
>
> Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it
outputs
> the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute. If
it
> does agree, it doesn't.
>
> Something like that at least.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that
has
> > a form= that disagrees with the schema default.
> >
> > Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I
just
> > tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged.
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: form attribute on xsd:element versus jaxb
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Actually, I think if the form doesn't equal the schema form, it outputs
the @XmlElement annotation with the proper namespace attribute. If it
does agree, it doesn't.
Something like that at least.
Dan
On Monday 29 October 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So far as I can see, JAXB has no place to annotate an element that has
> a form= that disagrees with the schema default.
>
> Should wsdl2java complain when someone feeds it such a schema? I just
> tried it with the current 2.0.3 snapshot, and no error emerged.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog