You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by "KV (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/03/16 18:26:27 UTC

[jira] Created: (COUCHDB-702) Why don't use BSON ?

Why don't use BSON ? 
---------------------

                 Key: COUCHDB-702
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-702
             Project: CouchDB
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Database Core
            Reporter: KV


I don't know a lot about architecture but if that's possible then why not ? It should improve disk and network performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Closed: (COUCHDB-702) Why don't use BSON ?

Posted by "Chris Anderson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chris Anderson closed COUCHDB-702.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid

BSON is a bad idea. It's not a standard and it tried to do odd stuff like have Date and Regex types.

JSON is a ubiquitous standard and just as fast as BSON.

> Why don't use BSON ? 
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-702
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Database Core
>            Reporter: KV
>
> I don't know a lot about architecture but if that's possible then why not ? It should improve disk and network performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.