You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@opennlp.apache.org by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> on 2017/07/01 15:20:42 UTC
[VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
The Apache OpenNLP PMC would like to call for a Vote on Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
Release Candidate.
The Release artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1014/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.8.1/
The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 tag at
https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.8.1
To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or opennlp-uima
to 1.8.1
and add the following URL to your settings.xml file:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1014
The artifacts have been signed with the Key - D3541808 found at
http://people.apache.org/keys/group/opennlp.asc
Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1. The vote is
open for the next 72 hours *ending on Monday, July 3 11AM EST *.
Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
Thanks again to all the committers and contributors for their work
over the past
few weeks.
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
Here's my +1 binding
1. Verified the sigs and hashsums
2. Ran a clean build of {src} * {zip, tar} and all unit tests pass
3. Verified RAT check
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> The Apache OpenNLP PMC would like to call for a Vote on Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
> Release Candidate.
>
> The Release artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopennlp-1014/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.8.1/
>
> The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 tag at
>
> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.8.1
>
> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or opennlp-uima
> to 1.8.1
>
> and add the following URL to your settings.xml file:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1014
>
> The artifacts have been signed with the Key - D3541808 found at
>
> http://people.apache.org/keys/group/opennlp.asc
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1. The vote
> is
>
> open for the next 72 hours *ending on Monday, July 3 11AM EST *.
>
> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> the
>
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
>
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks again to all the committers and contributors for their work over
> the past few weeks.
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
Thank you very much for that info. We reverted the change we did to
the sentence detector and will do this in a release after 1.8.1.
RC 2 is now available.
Jörn
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
<re...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 02.07.2017, at 19:13, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> one question, did you retrain or use existing models?
>
> The respective unit-test trains and evaluates - doesn't use an existing model.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
On 02.07.2017, at 19:13, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> one question, did you retrain or use existing models?
The respective unit-test trains and evaluates - doesn't use an existing model.
Cheers,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
Cancelling this VOTE and will push out another release candidate soon,
uncovered an issue with SentenceDetect wherein the default EOS is \n if a
model already doesn't have EOS chars set.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> one question, did you retrain or use existing models?
>
> Jörn
>
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
> <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I ran a DKPro Core build against the RC. Looks mostly fine. No code
> changes
> > are required after switching from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1. All unit tests except
> one
> > run as before.
> >
> > I can observer a change when training a sentence splitter model.
> >
> > With 1.8.0, I get
> >
> > F-score 0.937518
> > Precision 0.932157
> > Recall 0.942941
> >
> > With 1.8.1, I get
> >
> > F-score 0.922556
> > Precision 0.909975
> > Recall 0.935490
> >
> > I am using the germeval-2014 data for training.
> >
> > It is not a big drop, but it still is a change - maybe an undesired one?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > -- Richard
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
one question, did you retrain or use existing models?
Jörn
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
<re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I ran a DKPro Core build against the RC. Looks mostly fine. No code changes
> are required after switching from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1. All unit tests except one
> run as before.
>
> I can observer a change when training a sentence splitter model.
>
> With 1.8.0, I get
>
> F-score 0.937518
> Precision 0.932157
> Recall 0.942941
>
> With 1.8.1, I get
>
> F-score 0.922556
> Precision 0.909975
> Recall 0.935490
>
> I am using the germeval-2014 data for training.
>
> It is not a big drop, but it still is a change - maybe an undesired one?
>
> Best,
>
> -- Richard
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
I ran a DKPro Core build against the RC. Looks mostly fine. No code changes
are required after switching from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1. All unit tests except one
run as before.
I can observer a change when training a sentence splitter model.
With 1.8.0, I get
F-score 0.937518
Precision 0.932157
Recall 0.942941
With 1.8.1, I get
F-score 0.922556
Precision 0.909975
Recall 0.935490
I am using the germeval-2014 data for training.
It is not a big drop, but it still is a change - maybe an undesired one?
Best,
-- Richard
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
Here's my +1 binding
1. Verified the sigs and hashsums
2. Ran a clean build of {src} * {zip, tar} and all unit tests pass
3. Verified RAT check
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> The Apache OpenNLP PMC would like to call for a Vote on Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
> Release Candidate.
>
> The Release artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopennlp-1014/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.8.1/
>
> The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 tag at
>
> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.8.1
>
> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or opennlp-uima
> to 1.8.1
>
> and add the following URL to your settings.xml file:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1014
>
> The artifacts have been signed with the Key - D3541808 found at
>
> http://people.apache.org/keys/group/opennlp.asc
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1. The vote
> is
>
> open for the next 72 hours *ending on Monday, July 3 11AM EST *.
>
> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> the
>
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
>
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks again to all the committers and contributors for their work over
> the past few weeks.
>