You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2008/03/27 16:29:27 UTC
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2158) EJB remote interfaces should be
considered @Remotable
EJB remote interfaces should be considered @Remotable
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: TUSCANY-2158
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2158
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA EJB Binding Extension
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Fix For: Java-SCA-1.2
This is similar to what we are already doing for service interfaces annotated with @WebService.
Service interfaces annotated with @Remote or extending javax.ejb.EJBObject or java.rmi.Remote should be considered remotable as well.
Not considering them remotable currently forces the application developer to make a local copy of these interfaces and add the SCA @Remotable annotation to them.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2158) EJB remote interfaces should be
considered @Remotable
Posted by "Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-2158.
---------------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> EJB remote interfaces should be considered @Remotable
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2158
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2158
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA EJB Binding Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assignee: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Fix For: Java-SCA-1.2
>
>
> This is similar to what we are already doing for service interfaces annotated with @WebService.
> Service interfaces annotated with @Remote or extending javax.ejb.EJBObject or java.rmi.Remote should be considered remotable as well.
> Not considering them remotable currently forces the application developer to make a local copy of these interfaces and add the SCA @Remotable annotation to them.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org