You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2006/05/31 23:59:00 UTC

1.1 Final Items

Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1.

Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also 7 or 8 blockers.  I have not seen 
any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that there is no resource to fix them.

I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for those items that are considered 
hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 release.  I'll do this through a 
bulk change.

The remaining items are:

Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining list of items:

activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT

I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress testing.

Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)

Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.

When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday.

If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out next week and then move on to 
1.2 and beyond.

Thoughts?

Matt

Re: 1.1 Final Items

Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.

Ah, okay... not confused anymore ;-)

--jason


On May 31, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On May 31, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> TranQL has three components.  The Connectors (1.2-SNAPSHOT), the  
>> persistence engine (1.3-SNAPSHOT) and the vendors rars (various  
>> versions depending on the rar in question).
>>
>> Does that answer your question ?
>
> Matt,
> You have them both listed as "tranql_version". I think you mean:
>
> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
> tranql_connector_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
>
> --kevan
>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> Why 2 versions of TranQL?
>>> --jason
>>> On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>>> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish  
>>>> 1.1.
>>>>
>>>> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also  
>>>> 7 or 8 blockers.  I have not seen
>>>> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming  
>>>> that there is no resource to fix them.
>>>>
>>>> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and  
>>>> for those items that are considered
>>>> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the  
>>>> 1.1.1 release.  I'll do this through a
>>>> bulk change.
>>>>
>>>> The remaining items are:
>>>>
>>>> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining  
>>>> list of items:
>>>>
>>>> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
>>>> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>>> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>
>>>> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of  
>>>> stress testing.
>>>>
>>>> Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)
>>>>
>>>> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.
>>>>
>>>> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from  
>>>> Kevan and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday.
>>>>
>>>> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1  
>>>> out next week and then move on to
>>>> 1.2 and beyond.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>

Re: 1.1 Final Items

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.

On May 31, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> TranQL has three components.  The Connectors (1.2-SNAPSHOT), the  
> persistence engine (1.3-SNAPSHOT) and the vendors rars (various  
> versions depending on the rar in question).
>
> Does that answer your question ?

Matt,
You have them both listed as "tranql_version". I think you mean:

tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
tranql_connector_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT

--kevan

>
> Matt
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Why 2 versions of TranQL?
>> --jason
>> On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>>> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1.
>>>
>>> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also  
>>> 7 or 8 blockers.  I have not seen
>>> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that  
>>> there is no resource to fix them.
>>>
>>> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and  
>>> for those items that are considered
>>> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the  
>>> 1.1.1 release.  I'll do this through a
>>> bulk change.
>>>
>>> The remaining items are:
>>>
>>> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining  
>>> list of items:
>>>
>>> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
>>> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
>>> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress  
>>> testing.
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)
>>>
>>> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.
>>>
>>> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from  
>>> Kevan and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday.
>>>
>>> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1  
>>> out next week and then move on to
>>> 1.2 and beyond.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>

Re: 1.1 Final Items

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.

TranQL has three components.  The Connectors (1.2-SNAPSHOT), the persistence engine (1.3-SNAPSHOT) 
and the vendors rars (various versions depending on the rar in question).

Does that answer your question ?

Matt

Jason Dillon wrote:
> Why 2 versions of TranQL?
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1.
>>
>> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also 7 or 
>> 8 blockers.  I have not seen
>> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that 
>> there is no resource to fix them.
>>
>> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for 
>> those items that are considered
>> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 
>> release.  I'll do this through a
>> bulk change.
>>
>> The remaining items are:
>>
>> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining list 
>> of items:
>>
>> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
>> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
>> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
>> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
>> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress 
>> testing.
>>
>> Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)
>>
>> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.
>>
>> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan 
>> and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday.
>>
>> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out 
>> next week and then move on to
>> 1.2 and beyond.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Matt
>>
> 
> 
>

Re: 1.1 Final Items

Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.

Why 2 versions of TranQL?

--jason


On 5/31/06, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> Here are the outstanding issues and my proposed plans to finish 1.1.
>
> Currently there are 124 JIRAs out there for 1.1.  There are also 7 or 8 blockers.  I have not seen
> any activity on these items in the last week so I'm assuming that there is no resource to fix them.
>
> I propose that tomorrow I'll move the JIRA's in 1.1 to 1.2 and for those items that are considered
> hot and people want to work on them they can move them to the 1.1.1 release.  I'll do this through a
> bulk change.
>
> The remaining items are:
>
> Convert remaining SNAPSHOTs to releases.  Here is the remaining list of items:
>
> activemq_version=3.2.4-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> openejb_version=2.1-SNAPSHOT
> tranql_version=1.2-SNAPSHOT
> tranql_version=1.3-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_corba_version=1.0-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_j2ee_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_javamail_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> geronimo_spec_jcache_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
> daytrader_version=1.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> I will convert DayTrader and TranQL after the final set of stress testing.
>
> Any volunteers to convert the specs?  (Alan :)
>
> Kevan, we'll need you to sign off on the activemq versions.
>
> When the above is complete I suggest we get a final test from Kevan and cut a proposed 1.1 for Friday.
>
> If that's good (or if there are only minor fixes) we'll push 1.1 out next week and then move on to
> 1.2 and beyond.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Matt
>