You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/17 22:45:52 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HIVE-5304) JDO and SQL filters can both return
different results for string compares depending on underlying datastore
Sergey Shelukhin created HIVE-5304:
--------------------------------------
Summary: JDO and SQL filters can both return different results for string compares depending on underlying datastore
Key: HIVE-5304
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5304
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Metastore
Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
Hive uses JDOQL filters to optimize partition retrieval; recently direct SQL was added to optimize it further. Both of these methods may end up pushing StringCol op 'SomeString' to underlying SQL datastore. Many paths also pushes order by-s, although these are not as problematic.
The problem is that different datastores handle string compares differently.
While testing on Postgres, I see that results in different things, from innocent like order changes in "show partitions", to more serious like
{code}
alter table ptestfilter drop partition (c>='US', d<='2')
{code}
in drop_partitions_filter.q - in Derby, with which the .q.out file was generated, it drops "c=Uganda/d=2"; this also passes on MySQL (I ran tests with autocreated db); on Postgres with a db from the script it doesn't.
Looks like we need to enforce collation in partition names and part_key_values-es; both in the create scripts, as well as during autocreate (via package.jdo?)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira