You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by Murray Cumming <mu...@usa.net> on 2000/08/26 02:05:00 UTC
Re: [patch: virtual destructors]
Was this patch applied?
Murray Cumming <mu...@usa.net> wrote:
3 Xerces-C classes have virtual methods but do not have virtual destructors.
This causes many warnings when using the GNOME level of warnings.
Here is a small patch to correct this.
Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com
Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com
+44 7971 226563
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Re: [patch: virtual destructors]
Posted by Dean Roddey <dr...@charmedquark.com>.
I ran into Andy today as I was passing by JTC on the way to lunch. He said
that he's the only team IBM member on the job right now, because other folks
are on vacation or at conferences, etc... So he's probably a little bit
overburned right now :-)
--------------------------
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C++ Frameworks
Charmed Quark Software
droddey@charmedquark.com
http://www.charmedquark.com
"It takes two buttocks to make friction"
- African Proverb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Murray Cumming" <mu...@usa.net>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [patch: virtual destructors]
> Was this patch applied?
>
> Murray Cumming <mu...@usa.net> wrote:
> 3 Xerces-C classes have virtual methods but do not have virtual
destructors.
> This causes many warnings when using the GNOME level of warnings.
>
> Here is a small patch to correct this.
>
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc@usa.net
> www.murrayc.com
>