You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2011/05/11 14:33:25 UTC
[VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
release in the near future.
Cheers!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 11.05.2011 14:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
> release in the near future.
+1 to 2.3.12-beta.
- Sigs and hashes OK
- contents of tarballs identical
- contents of tag and tarballs identical
except for expected deltas
Build on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE 10 32 and 64, and RHEL 5 64
- with default, shared and static modules
- with module sets none, few, most, all
- against bundled APR/APU and external APR/APU 1.4.4/1.3.11
- using expat 2.0.1, pcre 8.12, openssl 1.0.0d, lua 5.1.4
- Tool chain:
- platform gcc except for Solaris 8+10 (gcc 4.1.2)
- CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing
(and -mpcu=v9 on Solaris)
Passed test framework on all those platforms for all available MPMs
(except simple)
- with shared and static modules using the "all" module set
- with bundled APR/APU and external APR/APU 1.4.4/1.3.11
One single reason for test failures fixed in APU 1.3.x and above, see
r1101657. It caused crashes for spawned processes like prg RewriteMaps
due to NULL cleanup registered in ldap rebind.
Regards,
Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
> release in the near future.
+1 for release as beta
FWIW, beta + beta-deps works for me on MinGW with existing constraints
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Sat, 14 May 2011, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.05.2011 12:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> ...
>> and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right?
>
> Correct. That's why I voted +1.
I also agree that it doesn't affect the 2.3.12 release. If we had some
newer apu, we could have rerolled the deps tarball. But let's just hope
that 2.3.13 will be there, soon.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 14.05.2011 12:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
> and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right?
Correct. That's why I voted +1.
Rainer
Re: [Discuss] -deps package revisioning
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
> On 5/20/2011 4:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include
> > apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service,
> > I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate
> > any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper.
>
> On the subject of your post, totally agree, we can wait a bit
> longer for httpd-2.3.13(Win64) signatures :) Not many changes
> here since beta tag.
>
> But here's the meta issue; how will httpd, moving forward, deal
> with revisioning -deps when there is no sensible reason to have
> a new httpd release?
It's been said before, and I'm talking about the moving forward
part here: For 2.4 we should *drop* -deps
We'll have to link to them one way or the other, but mirroring,
I believe, is the wrong way.
Recommending the appropriate seems more sensible to me.
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
[Discuss] -deps package revisioning
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/20/2011 4:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include
> apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service,
> I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate
> any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper.
On the subject of your post, totally agree, we can wait a bit
longer for httpd-2.3.13(Win64) signatures :) Not many changes
here since beta tag.
But here's the meta issue; how will httpd, moving forward, deal
with revisioning -deps when there is no sensible reason to have
a new httpd release?
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Vote passes! Moving tarballs to dist and allowing for
mirrors to sync. Will announce tomorrow!
On May 20, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include
> apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service,
> I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate
> any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper. However, please feel free to
> retest and revote should you feel so inclined ;)
>
> (as of now, we have 4 "binding" +1s: jeff, rainer, stefan, jim)
>
> Cheers!
>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include
apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service,
I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate
any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper. However, please feel free to
retest and revote should you feel so inclined ;)
(as of now, we have 4 "binding" +1s: jeff, rainer, stefan, jim)
Cheers!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/19/2011 8:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu
> vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs
> for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce.
+1
Once apr/apu votes are in process, I will roll 2.2.19. Allowing
24 hours for the 2.2.19 vote concurrent to the apr/apu votes,
I plan to wait for the mirrors to catch up, then announce.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu
vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs
for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On May 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
> We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or
> any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases
> are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :)
>
No one has suggested that...
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 14 May 2011, at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or
> any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases
> are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :)
>
> The windows issue is a non-issue (cruft in the bin/ directory, oh
> well)
> and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Betas
> are not meant to be perfect, and they are no fun if there are no bugs.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/13/2011 9:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>
>> On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>>>>
>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>>
>>>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
>>>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
>>>> release in the near future.
>>>
>>> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu)
>>>
>>> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
>>>
>>
>> Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with
>> HEAD.
>>
>> Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...
>
> We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP
> issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this
> beta? I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem
> with that.
We should /not/ be halting a *beta* when one platform, one feature, or
any other single documented issue has an issue. Versions and releases
are cheap, release it and get on with the next beta :)
The windows issue is a non-issue (cruft in the bin/ directory, oh well)
and the apu issue affects users who configure auth_ldap, right? Betas
are not meant to be perfect, and they are no fun if there are no bugs.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>>>
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>
>>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
>>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
>>> release in the near future.
>>
>> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu)
>>
>> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
>>
>
> Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with
> HEAD.
>
> Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...
We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP
issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this
beta? I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem
with that.
BTW, I'm a bit behind and probably can't test until tomorrow.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
>> release in the near future.
>
> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu)
>
> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
>
Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with
HEAD.
Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
> release in the near future.
+1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu)
As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though.
Is this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.12 as beta
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
All test pass: OSX and Fed14
+1
On May 11, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
> release in the near future.
>
> Cheers!
>