You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Glen Stampoultzis <gs...@iinet.net.au> on 2004/02/16 23:32:16 UTC
[VOTE] New development build
I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production
build.
Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the
development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we
could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.
Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's.
BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for this
release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end of Feb
anyway. Anyone got a conversion script?
Glen Stampoultzis
gstamp@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
So in case I wasn't clear myself.
+1 for a prod release. I favor 2.something-but-not-1 and
-0 for a dev release (its tested enough and lets face it we have a user
community primarily of late adopters...people still email me about 1.01 -- a
release from like 3 years ago)
--
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost
definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its
general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with
everything espoused in the above email.
> From: avik.sengupta@itellix.com
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <po...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:06:21 +051800
> To: POI Developers List <po...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] New development build
>
> +1 to do a dev and prod release...
>
> Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2
> release .. but please do what you prefer.
>
>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a
>>> production build.
>>>
>>> Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the
>>> development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively
>>> we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.
>>>
>>> Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's.
>>>
>>> BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for
>>> this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end
>>> of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Glen Stampoultzis
>>> gstamp@iinet.net.au
>>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by av...@itellix.com.
+1 to do a dev and prod release...
Our version numbers are pretty messed up, I would prefer a 2.1.x dev and a 2.2
release .. but please do what you prefer.
>
> >
> > I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a
> > production build.
> >
> > Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the
> > development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively
> > we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.
> >
> > Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's.
> >
> > BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for
> > this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end
> > of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Glen Stampoultzis
> > gstamp@iinet.net.au
> > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by Danny Mui <da...@muibros.com>.
+1
2.1 dev (if necessary)
2.5 prod
3.0 Super duper no memory use, instant spreadsheet version...
Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
>
> I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a
> production build.
>
> Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the
> development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively
> we could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.
>
> Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's.
>
> BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for
> this release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end
> of Feb anyway. Anyone got a conversion script?
>
>
>
>
> Glen Stampoultzis
> gstamp@iinet.net.au
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
> From: Glen Stampoultzis <gs...@iinet.net.au>
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <po...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:16:43 +1100
> To: "POI Developers List" <po...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] New development build
>
> At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote:
>> I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build
>> followed by a prod build?
>
> Yes. I assume it would be best to do a dev release first since it's a
> pretty big change. If you'd rather go straight to 2.5 that's okay with me.
>
I feel comfortable with the amount of testing that we've done and since it
has been tested in use. I don't feel we're going to accomplish a great deal
with a dev release of it. I do feel there will be point releases once it is
in use, but I can live with that.
>> The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1).
>
> Depending on our release date we may not have a choice. This was from Greg:
>
>> The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to
>> the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for
>> further instructions on how to "use" the new license.
*shrug* zzzz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by Glen Stampoultzis <gs...@iinet.net.au>.
At 04:54 PM 17/02/2004, you wrote:
>I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build
>followed by a prod build?
Yes. I assume it would be best to do a dev release first since it's a
pretty big change. If you'd rather go straight to 2.5 that's okay with me.
>The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1).
Depending on our release date we may not have a choice. This was from Greg:
> The Board has also mandated that all ASF software must be switched to
> the new license by March 1st, 2004. Please watch this space for
> further instructions on how to "use" the new license.
Re: [VOTE] New development build
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>.
I'm not following you? You mean for the escher stuff a new dev build
followed by a prod build?
The 2.0 series should all be under the same license (1.1).
--
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost
definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its
general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with
everything espoused in the above email.
> From: Glen Stampoultzis <gs...@iinet.net.au>
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <po...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:32:16 +1100
> To: poi-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] New development build
>
>
> I'd like to do a new development build followed soon after by a production
> build.
>
> Following our current quirky version standards this would be 2.1 for the
> development version and 3.0 for the production version. Alternatively we
> could go 2.5 for the production version. I really don't care.
>
> Please give your -1, -0, +0, +1's.
>
> BTW, we should probably look at upgrading to the new 2.0 license for this
> release. This will be forced upon us if we release after the end of Feb
> anyway. Anyone got a conversion script?
>
>
>
>
> Glen Stampoultzis
> gstamp@iinet.net.au
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org