You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> on 2010/09/18 10:26:54 UTC
Re: 1.6.13 release [Sept. 29]
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> It's been 3 months since the last 1.6.x release, and we've got a few
> items in STATUS or CHANGES which could warrant a release. I'd like to
> roll in 1 or 2 weeks, so please go through STATUS and do some review.
> If folks have thoughts on the timeliness of this release, or other
> changes which ought to be included, please discuss below.
>
> (Maybe this can be an activity for those attending the apache retreat
> this weekend?)
Okay, having heard nothing, I'm going to plan the release for Sept.
29. Get yer nominations and votes in!
-Hyrum
Re: 1.6.13 release [Sept. 29]
Posted by Geoff Rowell <ge...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> It's been 3 months since the last 1.6.x release, and we've got a few
>> items in STATUS or CHANGES which could warrant a release. I'd like to
>> roll in 1 or 2 weeks, so please go through STATUS and do some review.
>> If folks have thoughts on the timeliness of this release, or other
>> changes which ought to be included, please discuss below.
>>
>> (Maybe this can be an activity for those attending the apache retreat
>> this weekend?)
>
> Okay, having heard nothing, I'm going to plan the release for Sept.
> 29. Get yer nominations and votes in!
I'd like to have C. Michael Pilato's changes to svnmucc backported:
* 1000607
* 1000612
* 1001007
* 1001009
Thank you.
--
Geoff Rowell
geoff.rowell@gmail.com