You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU> on 2003/02/05 08:02:02 UTC
Re: svn commit: rev 4743 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_ra_svn
svnserve
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 02:00, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Since there's no check for whether an expected_checksum came over the
> wire, does that mean this change isn't compatible with older
> `svnserve's?
It won't be compatible. Prior to 1.0, it's easier if we don't worry
about ra_svn protocol compatibility. (Well, maybe the cutoff for that
should be beta, not 1.0. But I don't think we're there just yet.)
However, as a side point, I do have a marshal.c change almost ready (I
have to merge it with Eric's changes and test again) to allow optional
fields in tuples. That will make it easier to make compatible changes
to the protocol.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: rev 4743 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_ra_svn svnserve
Posted by Karl Fogel <kf...@newton.ch.collab.net>.
Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU> writes:
> It won't be compatible. Prior to 1.0, it's easier if we don't worry
> about ra_svn protocol compatibility. (Well, maybe the cutoff for that
> should be beta, not 1.0. But I don't think we're there just yet.)
Sounds good. I expect we'll be fielding some ra_svn questions for a
few days :-).
> However, as a side point, I do have a marshal.c change almost ready (I
> have to merge it with Eric's changes and test again) to allow optional
> fields in tuples. That will make it easier to make compatible changes
> to the protocol.
Great!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org