You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@apache.org> on 2009/04/02 10:04:16 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
>> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles property
>> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany bundles
>> in the command line.
>>
>> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in M2
>> RC.
>>
>
> Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
> All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
> implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
>
> I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
> please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
>
Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
Posted by Ramkumar R <ra...@gmail.com>.
I was able to download and unzip the artifacts successfully, and all the
samples
worked fine for me.
I think we need a minor change for a typo in the INSTALL file, shows
"tuscany-sca-2.0-M1" instead of "tuscany-sca-2.0-M2".
Overall looks good.. +1 from me.
Also just wanted to clarify, if we need to mention in the RELEASE_NOTES that
we comply with "SCA Assembly Model V1.1" (the latest from OASIS).
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:34 PM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
> >> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles
> property
> >> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany
> bundles
> >> in the command line.
> >>
> >> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in
> M2
> >> RC.
> >>
> >
> > Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
> > All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
> > implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
> >
> > I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
> > please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
> >
>
> Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
>
> ...ant
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
The changes are now merged into 2.0-M2 branch under 761748. Please go ahead
to spin another RC.
BTW, the sca/pom.xml references the maven-bundle-plugin and
maven-eclipse-compiler snapshot versions. I assume you will adjust when the
votes for them are passed.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:19 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> -1. There are a few issues:
>>
>> 1) Running "ant run-equinox" is failing for two reasons. The first issue
>> is
>> 2) and the 2nd issue is reported at:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2954.
>>
>> I also have to cast "-1" for the maven-bundle-plugin vote as the plugin
>> produces 3rd party bundles with Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: dependent and it
>> causes
>> duplicate META-INF/services resources.
>>
>> 2) The generated equinox config.ini issue which prevents the bundles from
>> being loaded using the "java -jar osgi...jar -configuration
>> ../features/configuration" command. The workaround is to remove the
>> offending "osgi-3.4.0-v20080605-1900.jar" from the osgi.bundles property.
>>
>> 3) A minor issue:
>> I am seeing an error message during the maven build. It is caused by a
>> bug
>> in our maven-eclipse-compiler (I fixed it and prepare for a 1.0.1
>> release).
>> The issue is not fatal.
>>
>> [INFO] Resolving OSGi bundle:
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
>> [ERROR] For input string: "1-1"
>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: For input string: "1-1"
>> at
>> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateBuilder.createBundleDescription(StateBuilder.java:78)
>> at
>> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateObjectFactoryImpl.createBundleDescription(StateObjectFactoryImpl.java:29)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:174)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:130)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:119)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:182)
>> ...
>> [INFO] OSGi bundle is resolved:
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:04 AM
>> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
>>>>> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles
>>>>> property
>>>>> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany
>>>>> bundles
>>>>> in the command line.
>>>>>
>>>>> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in
>>>>> M2
>>>>> RC.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
>>>> All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
>>>> implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
>>>> please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>
>>
>
> Thanks Raymond, i'll respin when ant run-equinox is fixed. Would be
> good to have some itests for the run-equinox target to help pick up
> osgi problems. You've made a few changes in trunk since the M2 branch
> was taken, are you expecting any of those to be included in M2 and if
> so could you copy them to the m2 branch?
>
> ...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
I'll try a merge.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:19 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> -1. There are a few issues:
>>
>> 1) Running "ant run-equinox" is failing for two reasons. The first issue
>> is
>> 2) and the 2nd issue is reported at:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2954.
>>
>> I also have to cast "-1" for the maven-bundle-plugin vote as the plugin
>> produces 3rd party bundles with Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: dependent and it
>> causes
>> duplicate META-INF/services resources.
>>
>> 2) The generated equinox config.ini issue which prevents the bundles from
>> being loaded using the "java -jar osgi...jar -configuration
>> ../features/configuration" command. The workaround is to remove the
>> offending "osgi-3.4.0-v20080605-1900.jar" from the osgi.bundles property.
>>
>> 3) A minor issue:
>> I am seeing an error message during the maven build. It is caused by a
>> bug
>> in our maven-eclipse-compiler (I fixed it and prepare for a 1.0.1
>> release).
>> The issue is not fatal.
>>
>> [INFO] Resolving OSGi bundle:
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
>> [ERROR] For input string: "1-1"
>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: For input string: "1-1"
>> at
>> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateBuilder.createBundleDescription(StateBuilder.java:78)
>> at
>> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateObjectFactoryImpl.createBundleDescription(StateObjectFactoryImpl.java:29)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:174)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:130)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:119)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:182)
>> ...
>> [INFO] OSGi bundle is resolved:
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:04 AM
>> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
>>>>> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles
>>>>> property
>>>>> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany
>>>>> bundles
>>>>> in the command line.
>>>>>
>>>>> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in
>>>>> M2
>>>>> RC.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
>>>> All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
>>>> implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
>>>> please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>
>>
>
> Thanks Raymond, i'll respin when ant run-equinox is fixed. Would be
> good to have some itests for the run-equinox target to help pick up
> osgi problems. You've made a few changes in trunk since the M2 branch
> was taken, are you expecting any of those to be included in M2 and if
> so could you copy them to the m2 branch?
>
> ...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1. There are a few issues:
>
> 1) Running "ant run-equinox" is failing for two reasons. The first issue is
> 2) and the 2nd issue is reported at:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2954.
>
> I also have to cast "-1" for the maven-bundle-plugin vote as the plugin
> produces 3rd party bundles with Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: dependent and it causes
> duplicate META-INF/services resources.
>
> 2) The generated equinox config.ini issue which prevents the bundles from
> being loaded using the "java -jar osgi...jar -configuration
> ../features/configuration" command. The workaround is to remove the
> offending "osgi-3.4.0-v20080605-1900.jar" from the osgi.bundles property.
>
> 3) A minor issue:
> I am seeing an error message during the maven build. It is caused by a bug
> in our maven-eclipse-compiler (I fixed it and prepare for a 1.0.1 release).
> The issue is not fatal.
>
> [INFO] Resolving OSGi bundle: org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
> [ERROR] For input string: "1-1"
> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: For input string: "1-1"
> at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateBuilder.createBundleDescription(StateBuilder.java:78)
> at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateObjectFactoryImpl.createBundleDescription(StateObjectFactoryImpl.java:29)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:174)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:130)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:119)
> at
> org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:182)
> ...
> [INFO] OSGi bundle is resolved:
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:04 AM
> To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
>>>> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles
>>>> property
>>>> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany
>>>> bundles
>>>> in the command line.
>>>>
>>>> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in
>>>> M2
>>>> RC.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
>>> All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
>>> implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
>>>
>>> I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
>>> please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
>>>
>>
>> Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
>>
>> ...ant
>
>
Thanks Raymond, i'll respin when ant run-equinox is fixed. Would be
good to have some itests for the run-equinox target to help pick up
osgi problems. You've made a few changes in trunk since the M2 branch
was taken, are you expecting any of those to be included in M2 and if
so could you copy them to the m2 branch?
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
-1. There are a few issues:
1) Running "ant run-equinox" is failing for two reasons. The first issue is
2) and the 2nd issue is reported at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2954.
I also have to cast "-1" for the maven-bundle-plugin vote as the plugin
produces 3rd party bundles with Eclipse-BuddyPolicy: dependent and it causes
duplicate META-INF/services resources.
2) The generated equinox config.ini issue which prevents the bundles from
being loaded using the "java -jar osgi...jar -configuration
../features/configuration" command. The workaround is to remove the
offending "osgi-3.4.0-v20080605-1900.jar" from the osgi.bundles property.
3) A minor issue:
I am seeing an error message during the maven build. It is caused by a bug
in our maven-eclipse-compiler (I fixed it and prepare for a 1.0.1 release).
The issue is not fatal.
[INFO] Resolving OSGi bundle: org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
[ERROR] For input string: "1-1"
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: For input string: "1-1"
at
org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateBuilder.createBundleDescription(StateBuilder.java:78)
at
org.eclipse.osgi.internal.resolver.StateObjectFactoryImpl.createBundleDescription(StateObjectFactoryImpl.java:29)
at
org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:174)
at
org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:130)
at
org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.osgi.BundleResolver.addBundle(BundleResolver.java:119)
at
org.apache.tuscany.maven.compiler.JavaCompiler.compile(JavaCompiler.java:182)
...
[INFO] OSGi bundle is resolved:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bpel.ode
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "ant elder" <an...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:04 AM
To: <de...@tuscany.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:13 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I found and fixed an issue [1] in our maven-bundle-plugin during the
>>> weekend. The code was adding the system bundle to the osgi.bundles
>>> property
>>> in the config.ini and that failed the load of Equinox with tuscany
>>> bundles
>>> in the command line.
>>>
>>> We probably have to release the plugin first and adjust the pom.xml in
>>> M2
>>> RC.
>>>
>>
>> Are you going to do the plugin release or hoping someone else will?
>> All the samples and tests look like they're running so what are the
>> implications of leaving fixing this till M3?
>>
>> I'll leave this RC vote running for now, if any of you have some time
>> please do keep reviewing this RC to help find all the issues.
>>
>
> Still needs some reviews or votes on this, anyone?
>
> ...ant