Re: Planned change on TypeConvertorRegistry.java

[Ulf Dittmer <ul...@ulfdittmer.com>]

Hi-

I've got no objection to the change, just a question about the 
convertor.

As an example, Integer -> String conversion is covered by the generic 
Object -> String conversion,
but what about int -> String? It looks like that would not happen, even 
though it's easy enough to do.
Or would that cause trouble in cases where both varieties exist and 
have different meaning,
e.g. the StringBuffer constructor? Am I missing something?

Cheers,
Ulf


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bsf-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bsf-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org