Re: 10.3.3 release

[Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Kim Haase <Ca...@sun.com> wrote:
> Thanks for doing this, Andrew. I did a spot check of the docs and they're
> the right ones (10.3).
>
>  Should the copyright files in each doc be updated to say "2004-2008"
> instead of 2007?

Yes, they should be updated to include 2008. I will update these
tomorrow. Thanks for checking this.

andrew

Re: 10.3.3 release

[Kim Haase <Ca...@Sun.COM>]

Perfect, Andrew -- thanks!

Kim

Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Kim Haase <Ca...@sun.com> wrote:
>> Thanks very much, Andrew. I forgot to mention that the <copyryear> tag in
>> the ditamap files for the books also needs to be changed, though you may
>> have remembered this already.
> 
> I updated the copyright year in all the locations I was aware of.
> Please let me know if I missed anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> andrew

Re: 10.3.3 release

[Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Kim Haase <Ca...@sun.com> wrote:
> Thanks very much, Andrew. I forgot to mention that the <copyryear> tag in
> the ditamap files for the books also needs to be changed, though you may
> have remembered this already.

I updated the copyright year in all the locations I was aware of.
Please let me know if I missed anything.

Thanks,
andrew

Re: 10.3.3 release

[Kim Haase <Ca...@Sun.COM>]

Thanks very much, Andrew. I forgot to mention that the <copyryear> tag 
in the ditamap files for the books also needs to be changed, though you 
may have remembered this already.

Kim

Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Kim Haase <Ca...@sun.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for doing this, Andrew. I did a spot check of the docs and they're
>> the right ones (10.3).
>>
>>  Should the copyright files in each doc be updated to say "2004-2008"
>> instead of 2007?
> 
> Yes, they should be updated to include 2008. I will update these
> tomorrow. Thanks for checking this.
> 
> andrew