You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2009/07/02 00:20:25 UTC

How are snapshots getting deployed from hudson?

The recommendation is that snapshots that get deployed to apache's  
nexus be timestamped.  I fixed the build so that mvn clean deploy will  
result in unique (timestamped) snapshots but the ones on nexus are  
still non-unique.  A little detective work reveals that they are  
getting deployed by ci-hudson.  However the hudson builds on the  
apache hudson are only running mvn clean install  so I'm wondering how  
the snapshots are getting deployed.

I found an email referring to http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/2009/04/17/Continuous+Integration+Server
Is this the latest documentation?

thanks
david jencks

Re: How are snapshots getting deployed from hudson?

Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi David,

saw your ping on irc, but have problems connecting to it at the moment.

Anyhow,

there's an option in Hudson config for the project called "Post-build
actions" and there it is checked "Deploy artifacts to Maven repository" with
the url of repo.

Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:20 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> The recommendation is that snapshots that get deployed to apache's nexus be
> timestamped.  I fixed the build so that mvn clean deploy will result in
> unique (timestamped) snapshots but the ones on nexus are still non-unique.
>  A little detective work reveals that they are getting deployed by
> ci-hudson.  However the hudson builds on the apache hudson are only running
> mvn clean install  so I'm wondering how the snapshots are getting deployed.
>
> I found an email referring to
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/2009/04/17/Continuous+Integration+Server
> Is this the latest documentation?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>