Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)

[Stíofán Ó Miadhacháin <st...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

I have installed CS 4.0.2 against VMware, using basic networking and used
the same address space, a /23, for guest and management.

My SSVM fails to mount NFS based SS, I have since read on a thread in this
mailing list that this is because the guest and management networks need to
be on unique CIDRs.

Can someone confirm this? Is there anyway to have them live on the same
space as long as the addresses don't overlap?

Regards,
Stephen

RE: Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)

[David Ortiz <dp...@outlook.com>]

Stephen,
     I have NFS based SS running on a flat network alongside my guests with basic networking with 4.0.1.  I would expect that to still be viable in 4.0.2.
Thanks,     Dave

> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:17:15 +0100
> Subject: Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)
> From: stephen.meehan@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have installed CS 4.0.2 against VMware, using basic networking and used
> the same address space, a /23, for guest and management.
> 
> My SSVM fails to mount NFS based SS, I have since read on a thread in this
> mailing list that this is because the guest and management networks need to
> be on unique CIDRs.
> 
> Can someone confirm this? Is there anyway to have them live on the same
> space as long as the addresses don't overlap?
> 
> Regards,
> Stephen
 		 	   		  

Re: Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)

[Shanker Balan <sh...@shapeblue.com>]

Hi Stíofán,

On 21-Aug-2013, at 2:47 PM, Stíofán Ó Miadhacháin <st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have installed CS 4.0.2 against VMware, using basic networking and used
> the same address space, a /23, for guest and management.
>
> My SSVM fails to mount NFS based SS, I have since read on a thread in this
> mailing list that this is because the guest and management networks need to
> be on unique CIDRs.


You can certainly use the same CIDR for management, storage and guest on Basic networks. Its
a supported configuration for as long as I can remember.


>
> Can someone confirm this? Is there anyway to have them live on the same
> space as long as the addresses don't overlap?
>


Have you had a chance to run /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh from the SSVM VM? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-templates-secondary-storage-troubleshooting.html should help in debugging the issue further.

Regards.


--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.balan@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.