You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Andrew Or (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/11 00:09:40 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-13696) Remove BlockStore interface to more
cleanly reflect different memory and disk store responsibilities
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrew Or resolved SPARK-13696.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Remove BlockStore interface to more cleanly reflect different memory and disk store responsibilities
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-13696
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13696
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Block Manager
> Reporter: Josh Rosen
> Assignee: Josh Rosen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Today, both the MemoryStore and DiskStore implement a common BlockStore API, but I feel that this API is inappropriate because it abstracts away important distinctions between the behavior of these two stores.
> For instance, the disk store doesn't have a notion of storing deserialized objects, so it's confusing for it to expose object-based APIs like putIterator() and getValues() instead of only exposing binary APIs and pushing the responsibilities of serialization and deserialization to the client.
> As part of a larger BlockManager interface cleanup, I'd like to remove the BlockStore API and refine the MemoryStore and DiskStore interfaces to reflect more narrow sets of responsibilities for those components.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org