[jira] Resolved: (SMX4-120) change SOAPFactory and MessageFactory name in saaj-impl bundle

["Freeman Fang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Freeman Fang resolved SMX4-120.
-------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 4.0-m2
       Resolution: Fixed

svn commit . -m "[SMX4-120]change SOAPFactory and MessageFactory name in saaj-impl bundle"
Sending        saaj-impl-1.3/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory
Sending        saaj-impl-1.3/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 698846.

> change SOAPFactory and MessageFactory name in saaj-impl bundle
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SMX4-120
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-120
>             Project: ServiceMix 4
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Freeman Fang
>            Assignee: Freeman Fang
>             Fix For: 4.0-m2
>
>
> the  saaj-impl bundle specify some meta-data under META-INFO/services like
> javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory and javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory
> currently in javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory we use the the abstract facade factory class com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.SOAPFactoryImpl
> and in javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory we use the abstract facade  com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.MessageFactoryImpl
> But generally when we use saaj api to create soap mesasge, we use some code like 
>                 if (version.getVersion() == 1.1) {
>                     factory = MessageFactory.newInstance();
>                 } else {
>                     factory = MessageFactory.newInstance(SOAPConstants.SOAP_1_2_PROTOCOL);
>                 }
> if we create soap 11 message factory, we always don't specify the soap protocol name, in this case the current metadate for saaj-impl bundle would cause OperationNotSupported exception since we specify abstract facade factory class now.
> we should use com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl and com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl instead to make this bundle more tolerable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.