You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "David Smiley (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/01 13:51:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-16368) Refactoring: Use SolrClient type instead of overly specific subclasses

David Smiley created SOLR-16368:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Refactoring: Use SolrClient type instead of overly specific subclasses
                 Key: SOLR-16368
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16368
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Improvement
      Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
            Reporter: David Smiley
            Assignee: Eric Pugh


There are many references to a specific SolrClient subclass that could simply refer to SolrClient generally, or perhaps CloudSolrClient.  This impedes switching/migrating to different SolrClient implementations.  A similar example: we know it's a bad practice to declare a List as ArrayList even when it is one; the idea here with SolrClient is the same.

And furthermore, often times "var solrClient = ..." (or even "var solr = ...") is totally adequate in the Solr codebase within a method because the variable name adequately communicates the type.  These sorts of changes should happen first, and then weaken type references in APIs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org