You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Valentin Kulichenko <va...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/11 07:51:14 UTC

Transactions in atomics

Folks,

I noticed that we use pessimistic transaction to update atomic reference.
Is there any reason for that? Why don't we use atomic cache and invoke()
instead?

-Val

Re: Transactions in atomics

Posted by Valentin Kulichenko <va...@gmail.com>.

Here we go: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2893

-Val

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org> wrote:

> Val, can you please file a newbie ticket for this (if it is not there
> already)?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-03-11 9:51 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I noticed that we use pessimistic transaction to update atomic reference.
> > Is there any reason for that? Why don't we use atomic cache and invoke()
> > instead?
> >
> > -Val
> >
>

Re: Transactions in atomics

Posted by Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>.

Val, can you please file a newbie ticket for this (if it is not there
already)?

--Yakov

2016-03-11 9:51 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com
>:

> Folks,
>
> I noticed that we use pessimistic transaction to update atomic reference.
> Is there any reason for that? Why don't we use atomic cache and invoke()
> instead?
>
> -Val
>