You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/27 15:44:13 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-11899) Please create a swarm decommission mode

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Aleksey Yeschenko updated CASSANDRA-11899:
------------------------------------------
    Summary: Please create a swarm decommission mode  (was: Please create a swarm decommission node)

> Please create a swarm decommission mode
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11899
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mark Danko
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Right now when I remove a node that is up I understand 2 choices.
> nodetool decommission:  The current hosts starts sending out data as the only source. This takes a long time. The one node you want to remove becomes a huge bottle neck (even worse if you want to remove it because it is under performing).
> cassandra stop, then nodetool removenode: This lets all other nodes  that share the keyranges be sources. This runs about 8-16X faster than decommission on my system, but this requires me to run with reduced redundancy when it happens.
> I think it would be really cool if there was a way to decommission a node that is up, and leverage the power of other data sources.
> Request : When you decommission a node all other nodes that share a keyrange should also help in being sources for the data that needs to be copied.  Maybe, with options for how far to get the data/balance of load:  old behavior, same rack, same dc, other dc (or some default scheme based on latency between nodes/racks/dcs). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)