You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> on 2012/05/29 01:19:31 UTC

tomee webapp proposal

Guys,
I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
log file.
Please check the mockup I created for it:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png

What do you think?

Thanks,
Thiago.

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
For those who are curious, the mockup has been created using Balsamiq
Mockups I suppose :)

http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> wrote:
> Guys,
> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
> log file.
> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Thiago.

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
should be fine now

- Romain


2012/6/7 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> yes,
>
> metadata complete, we need to provide the ejb-jar.xml
>
> - Romain
>
>
>
> 2012/6/7 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
>> Romain,
>> It seems the Deployer is not being injected. You know what might be wrong?
>>
>> []s,
>> Thiago.
>>
>>
>> java.lang.NullPointerException >>
>>
>>
>> {"exception_type":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException","message":"java.lang.NullPointerException","status_code":"500","stackTrace":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException:
>> java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:56)\n\tat
>> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641)\n\tat
>> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:169)\n\tat
>> org.apache.tomee.catalina.OpenEJBValve.invoke(OpenEJBValve.java:45)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:927)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:309)\n\tat
>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)\n\tat
>>
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)\n\tat
>> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)\nCaused by:
>> java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
>>
>> org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:48)\n\t...
>> 19 more\n"}
>> 1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > cool... tkx!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> added some code,
>> >>
>> >> not perfect and i think you'll need to tweak it a bit but the logic
>> should
>> >> be here
>> >>
>> >> - Romain
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Romain,
>> >> >
>> >> > I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.
>> >> >
>> >> > When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
>> >> > servlet:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you
>> can
>> >> > deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue
>> >> with
>> >> > the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think
>> it
>> >> is
>> >> > going pretty well.
>> >> >
>> >> > []s,
>> >> > Thiago.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >> > >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Thanks!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > - Romain
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Sure...
>> >> > > > I will do it right away.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > []s,
>> >> > > > Thiago.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >> > > > >wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a
>> >> > "deploy"
>> >> > > > tab
>> >> > > > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
>> >> > > > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > - Romain
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and
>> >> with
>> >> > > > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler
>> >> for
>> >> > > > getting
>> >> > > > > > help from the community.
>> >> > > > > > Thanks,
>> >> > > > > > Thiago.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
>> >> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp),
>> >> depending on
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is
>> getting
>> >> > > > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> >> > > > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other
>> hand
>> >> > > would
>> >> > > > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know
>> Dojo
>> >> does
>> >> > > > such
>> >> > > > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
>> >> > > > perspective/view
>> >> > > > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> >> > > > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> >> > > > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Cheers
>> >> > > > > > > Daniel
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> >> > > > thiago@veronezi.org>
>> >> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very
>> hard to
>> >> > read
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
>> >> > floating
>> >> > > > in
>> >> > > > > > > > similar to digg.com?
>> >> > > > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I
>> have
>> >> > > > experience
>> >> > > > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we
>> have
>> >> > this
>> >> > > > > > feature
>> >> > > > > > > > available at the server side.
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log
>> >> panel
>> >> > > and
>> >> > > > > two
>> >> > > > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> >> > > > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > What you guys think?
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
>> >> > > > > > > > []s,
>> >> > > > > > > > Thiago.
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
>> >> > > > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
>> >> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would
>> make
>> >> > sense
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire
>> >> screen so
>> >> > > log
>> >> > > > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log
>> >> viewer
>> >> > > > where
>> >> > > > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> >> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > >> Cheers
>> >> > > > > > > >> Daniel
>> >> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> >> > > > > thiago@veronezi.org
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > >> > Guys,
>> >> > > > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the
>> >> new
>> >> > > > webapp.
>> >> > > > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a
>> >> new
>> >> > one
>> >> > > > > which
>> >> > > > > > > will
>> >> > > > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi
>> >> tree
>> >> > > and
>> >> > > > > the
>> >> > > > > > > tomee
>> >> > > > > > > >> > log file.
>> >> > > > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> >> > > > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > > > > >> > What do you think?
>> >> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> >> > > > > > > >> > Thiago.
>> >> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
yes,

metadata complete, we need to provide the ejb-jar.xml

- Romain


2012/6/7 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Romain,
> It seems the Deployer is not being injected. You know what might be wrong?
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException >>
>
>
> {"exception_type":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException","message":"java.lang.NullPointerException","status_code":"500","stackTrace":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException:
> java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
>
> org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:56)\n\tat
> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641)\n\tat
> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:169)\n\tat
> org.apache.tomee.catalina.OpenEJBValve.invoke(OpenEJBValve.java:45)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:927)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)\n\tat
>
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:309)\n\tat
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)\n\tat
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)\n\tat
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)\nCaused by:
> java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
>
> org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:48)\n\t...
> 19 more\n"}
> 1
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
> >wrote:
>
> > cool... tkx!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> added some code,
> >>
> >> not perfect and i think you'll need to tweak it a bit but the logic
> should
> >> be here
> >>
> >> - Romain
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >>
> >> > Hi Romain,
> >> >
> >> > I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.
> >> >
> >> > When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
> >> > servlet:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you
> can
> >> > deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue
> >> with
> >> > the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think it
> >> is
> >> > going pretty well.
> >> >
> >> > []s,
> >> > Thiago.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks!
> >> > >
> >> > > - Romain
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> > >
> >> > > > Sure...
> >> > > > I will do it right away.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > []s,
> >> > > > Thiago.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> > > > >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a
> >> > "deploy"
> >> > > > tab
> >> > > > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> >> > > > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - Romain
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and
> >> with
> >> > > > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler
> >> for
> >> > > > getting
> >> > > > > > help from the community.
> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > Thiago.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
> >> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp),
> >> depending on
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is
> getting
> >> > > > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> >> > > > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other
> hand
> >> > > would
> >> > > > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo
> >> does
> >> > > > such
> >> > > > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> >> > > > perspective/view
> >> > > > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> >> > > > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> >> > > > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Cheers
> >> > > > > > > Daniel
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> >> > > > thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard
> to
> >> > read
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
> >> > floating
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > similar to digg.com?
> >> > > > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> >> > > > experience
> >> > > > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we
> have
> >> > this
> >> > > > > > feature
> >> > > > > > > > available at the server side.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log
> >> panel
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > two
> >> > > > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> >> > > > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > What you guys think?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> >> > > > > > > > []s,
> >> > > > > > > > Thiago.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> >> > > > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make
> >> > sense
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire
> >> screen so
> >> > > log
> >> > > > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log
> >> viewer
> >> > > > where
> >> > > > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> Cheers
> >> > > > > > > >> Daniel
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> >> > > > > thiago@veronezi.org
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >> > Guys,
> >> > > > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the
> >> new
> >> > > > webapp.
> >> > > > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a
> >> new
> >> > one
> >> > > > > which
> >> > > > > > > will
> >> > > > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi
> >> tree
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > tomee
> >> > > > > > > >> > log file.
> >> > > > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> > > > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > What do you think?
> >> > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > >> > Thiago.
> >> > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Romain,
It seems the Deployer is not being injected. You know what might be wrong?

[]s,
Thiago.


java.lang.NullPointerException >>

{"exception_type":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException","message":"java.lang.NullPointerException","status_code":"500","stackTrace":"org.apache.tomee.webapp.TomeeException:
java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:56)\n\tat
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641)\n\tat
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:169)\n\tat
org.apache.tomee.catalina.OpenEJBValve.invoke(OpenEJBValve.java:45)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:927)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)\n\tat
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)\n\tat
org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)\n\tat
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:309)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)\n\tat
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)\nCaused by:
java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
org.apache.tomee.webapp.servlet.DeployServlet.doPost(DeployServlet.java:48)\n\t...
19 more\n"}
1


On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>wrote:

> cool... tkx!
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> added some code,
>>
>> not perfect and i think you'll need to tweak it a bit but the logic should
>> be here
>>
>> - Romain
>>
>>
>> 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>>
>> > Hi Romain,
>> >
>> > I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.
>> >
>> > When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
>> > servlet:
>> >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948
>> >
>> >
>> > Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you can
>> > deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue
>> with
>> > the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think it
>> is
>> > going pretty well.
>> >
>> > []s,
>> > Thiago.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks!
>> > >
>> > > - Romain
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> > >
>> > > > Sure...
>> > > > I will do it right away.
>> > > >
>> > > > []s,
>> > > > Thiago.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a
>> > "deploy"
>> > > > tab
>> > > > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
>> > > > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Romain
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and
>> with
>> > > > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler
>> for
>> > > > getting
>> > > > > > help from the community.
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Thiago.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
>> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp),
>> depending on
>> > > the
>> > > > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> > > > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> > > > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand
>> > > would
>> > > > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo
>> does
>> > > > such
>> > > > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
>> > > > perspective/view
>> > > > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> > > > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> > > > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > > > Daniel
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> > > > thiago@veronezi.org>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to
>> > read
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
>> > floating
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > > > similar to digg.com?
>> > > > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
>> > > > experience
>> > > > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have
>> > this
>> > > > > > feature
>> > > > > > > > available at the server side.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log
>> panel
>> > > and
>> > > > > two
>> > > > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> > > > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > What you guys think?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
>> > > > > > > > []s,
>> > > > > > > > Thiago.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
>> > > > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make
>> > sense
>> > > to
>> > > > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire
>> screen so
>> > > log
>> > > > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log
>> viewer
>> > > > where
>> > > > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Cheers
>> > > > > > > >> Daniel
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> > > > > thiago@veronezi.org
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> > Guys,
>> > > > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the
>> new
>> > > > webapp.
>> > > > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a
>> new
>> > one
>> > > > > which
>> > > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi
>> tree
>> > > and
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > tomee
>> > > > > > > >> > log file.
>> > > > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> > > > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > What do you think?
>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> > Thiago.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
cool... tkx!


On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> added some code,
>
> not perfect and i think you'll need to tweak it a bit but the logic should
> be here
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.
> >
> > When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
> > servlet:
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948
> >
> >
> > Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you can
> > deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue
> with
> > the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think it is
> > going pretty well.
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > >
> > > > Sure...
> > > > I will do it right away.
> > > >
> > > > []s,
> > > > Thiago.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a
> > "deploy"
> > > > tab
> > > > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> > > > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Romain
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> > > > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for
> > > > getting
> > > > > > help from the community.
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Thiago.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > > > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > > > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand
> > > would
> > > > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo
> does
> > > > such
> > > > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> > > > perspective/view
> > > > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > > > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > > > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > Daniel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > > > thiago@veronezi.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to
> > read
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
> > floating
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > similar to digg.com?
> > > > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> > > > experience
> > > > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have
> > this
> > > > > > feature
> > > > > > > > available at the server side.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log
> panel
> > > and
> > > > > two
> > > > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What you guys think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > > > > > []s,
> > > > > > > > Thiago.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> > > > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make
> > sense
> > > to
> > > > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen
> so
> > > log
> > > > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log
> viewer
> > > > where
> > > > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Cheers
> > > > > > > >> Daniel
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > > > > thiago@veronezi.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > Guys,
> > > > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> > > > webapp.
> > > > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new
> > one
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi
> tree
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > tomee
> > > > > > > >> > log file.
> > > > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > What do you think?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> > Thiago.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
added some code,

not perfect and i think you'll need to tweak it a bit but the logic should
be here

- Romain


2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Hi Romain,
>
> I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.
>
> When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
> servlet:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948
>
>
> Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you can
> deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue with
> the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think it is
> going pretty well.
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >
> > > Sure...
> > > I will do it right away.
> > >
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a
> "deploy"
> > > tab
> > > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> > > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
> > > >
> > > > - Romain
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > > >
> > > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> > > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for
> > > getting
> > > > > help from the community.
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Thiago.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on
> > the
> > > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand
> > would
> > > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
> > > such
> > > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> > > perspective/view
> > > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > Daniel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > > thiago@veronezi.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to
> read
> > > the
> > > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
> floating
> > > in
> > > > > > > similar to digg.com?
> > > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> > > experience
> > > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have
> this
> > > > > feature
> > > > > > > available at the server side.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel
> > and
> > > > two
> > > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What you guys think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > > > > []s,
> > > > > > > Thiago.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> > > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make
> sense
> > to
> > > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so
> > log
> > > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
> > > where
> > > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers
> > > > > > >> Daniel
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > > > thiago@veronezi.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > Guys,
> > > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> > > webapp.
> > > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new
> one
> > > > which
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree
> > and
> > > > the
> > > > > > tomee
> > > > > > >> > log file.
> > > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > What do you think?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Thiago.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Hi Romain,

I created the skeleton of the new gui deployment feature.

When you upload a file from the new "Apps" tab, the system calls this
servlet:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/trunk/openejb/tomee/tomee-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/webapp/servlet/DeployServlet.java?view=markup&pathrev=1346948


Note that the "path" attribute is the full file path. From there you can
deploy your application. Can you complete that class? I will continue with
the client side this evening. I still have a lot to do, but I think it is
going pretty well.

[]s,
Thiago.


On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
> > Sure...
> > I will do it right away.
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a "deploy"
> > tab
> > > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> > > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > >
> > > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> > > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for
> > getting
> > > > help from the community.
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Thiago.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on
> the
> > > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand
> would
> > > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
> > such
> > > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> > perspective/view
> > > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Daniel
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > thiago@veronezi.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read
> > the
> > > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating
> > in
> > > > > > similar to digg.com?
> > > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> > experience
> > > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> > > > feature
> > > > > > available at the server side.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel
> and
> > > two
> > > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What you guys think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > > > []s,
> > > > > > Thiago.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense
> to
> > > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so
> log
> > > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
> > where
> > > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers
> > > > > >> Daniel
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > > thiago@veronezi.org
> > > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > Guys,
> > > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> > webapp.
> > > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> > > which
> > > > > will
> > > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree
> and
> > > the
> > > > > tomee
> > > > > >> > log file.
> > > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > What do you think?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > Thiago.
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Thanks!

- Romain


2012/6/6 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Sure...
> I will do it right away.
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a "deploy"
> tab
> > where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> > (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >
> > > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> > > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for
> getting
> > > help from the community.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> > > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> > > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
> such
> > > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> > > >
> > > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> perspective/view
> > > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read
> the
> > > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > > > >
> > > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating
> in
> > > > > similar to digg.com?
> > > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> experience
> > > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> > > feature
> > > > > available at the server side.
> > > > >
> > > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and
> > two
> > > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > > > >
> > > > > What you guys think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > > []s,
> > > > > Thiago.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> > > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> > > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
> where
> > > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Cheers
> > > > >> Daniel
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> > thiago@veronezi.org
> > > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > Guys,
> > > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> webapp.
> > > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> > which
> > > > will
> > > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
> > the
> > > > tomee
> > > > >> > log file.
> > > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > What do you think?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Thiago.
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Sure...
I will do it right away.

[]s,
Thiago.

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> @Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a "deploy" tab
> where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
> (mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
> > Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> > javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for getting
> > help from the community.
> > Thanks,
> > Thiago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> > > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> > > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> > > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> > >
> > > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> > > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > > >
> > > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > > > similar to digg.com?
> > > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> > feature
> > > > available at the server side.
> > > >
> > > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and
> two
> > > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > > >
> > > > What you guys think?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > > []s,
> > > > Thiago.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> > > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> > > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> > > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers
> > > >> Daniel
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Guys,
> > > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> which
> > > will
> > > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
> the
> > > tomee
> > > >> > log file.
> > > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What do you think?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Thiago.
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Thiago: i know you are busy with the tree but could you add a "deploy" tab
where we can deploy either from an upload or from a string
(mvn:gId/aId/version/war for instance)?

- Romain


2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
> javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for getting
> help from the community.
> Thanks,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >
> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > >
> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > > similar to digg.com?
> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> feature
> > > available at the server side.
> > >
> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > >
> > > What you guys think?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Daniel
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Guys,
> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> > will
> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> > tomee
> > >> > log file.
> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Thiago.
> > >>
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Probably is better to keep the simple again. Simple html and with
javascript is straightforward for me... and it may be simpler for getting
help from the community.
Thanks,
Thiago.


On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>
> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> wrote:
> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >
> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > similar to digg.com?
> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
> > available at the server side.
> >
> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >
> > What you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback!
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Guys,
> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> will
> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> tomee
> >> > log file.
> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Thiago.
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Yep, but I suppose my point was could we always guarantee that the
user's browser is WS capable or do we just want to require users to
use WS-capable browsers?

Cheers
Daniel

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we have websockets :p
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>
>> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
>> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
>> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
>> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>>
>> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
>> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
>> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> >
>> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
>> > similar to digg.com?
>> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
>> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
>> > available at the server side.
>> >
>> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
>> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> >
>> > What you guys think?
>> >
>> > Thanks for the feedback!
>> > []s,
>> > Thiago.
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
>> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Guys,
>> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
>> will
>> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
>> tomee
>> >> > log file.
>> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >> >
>> >> > What do you think?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Thiago.
>> >>
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
we have websockets :p

- Romain


2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>

> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>
> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> wrote:
> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >
> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > similar to digg.com?
> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
> > available at the server side.
> >
> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >
> > What you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback!
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Guys,
> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> will
> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> tomee
> >> > log file.
> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Thiago.
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
let's do something working first then we'll see, but i'm not fan of polling
too

- Romain


2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>

> Okay so I might have gotten that wrong. I thought implementing auto
> refresh later on could mean to use client-side polling or server-side
> push...
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > but we said we'll not use long polling so it should be fine ;)
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >
> >> No implementing client-side long polling in JavaScript might be
> >> causing issues...
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > what do you mean?
> >> >
> >> > clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh?
> >> >
> >> > - Romain
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
> >> >> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or
> similar
> >> >> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
> >> >> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29
> >> >>
> >> >> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that
> >> hangs
> >> >> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser
> >> should
> >> >> be
> >> >> > able to handle it.
> >> >> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can
> load
> >> the
> >> >> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new
> >> interface
> >> >> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you
> think?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> Eclipse RAP
> >> >> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely
> >> take
> >> >> a
> >> >> > look. Thanks!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  Thiago.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <
> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on
> the
> >> >> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> >> >> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> >> >> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand
> would
> >> >> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
> >> such
> >> >> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> >> perspective/view
> >> >> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> >> >> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> >> >> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> >> Daniel
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> >> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to
> read
> >> the
> >> >> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are
> floating
> >> in
> >> >> >> > similar to digg.com?
> >> >> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> >> experience
> >> >> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have
> this
> >> >> feature
> >> >> >> > available at the server side.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel
> and
> >> two
> >> >> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > What you guys think?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks for the feedback!
> >> >> >> > []s,
> >> >> >> > Thiago.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> >> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make
> sense to
> >> >> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so
> log
> >> >> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
> >> where
> >> >> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> >> >> Daniel
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> >> >> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > Guys,
> >> >> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> >> webapp.
> >> >> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new
> one
> >> >> which
> >> >> >> will
> >> >> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree
> and
> >> the
> >> >> >> tomee
> >> >> >> >> > log file.
> >> >> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > What do you think?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> > Thiago.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Okay so I might have gotten that wrong. I thought implementing auto
refresh later on could mean to use client-side polling or server-side
push...

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> but we said we'll not use long polling so it should be fine ;)
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>
>> No implementing client-side long polling in JavaScript might be
>> causing issues...
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > what do you mean?
>> >
>> > clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh?
>> >
>> > - Romain
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> >
>> >> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
>> >> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar
>> >> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
>> >> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...
>> >>
>> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29
>> >>
>> >> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that
>> hangs
>> >> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser
>> should
>> >> be
>> >> > able to handle it.
>> >> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load
>> the
>> >> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new
>> interface
>> >> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
>> >> >
>> >> >>> Eclipse RAP
>> >> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely
>> take
>> >> a
>> >> > look. Thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> >  Thiago.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
>> >> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> >> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> >> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
>> >> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
>> such
>> >> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
>> perspective/view
>> >> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> >> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> >> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> thiago@veronezi.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read
>> the
>> >> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating
>> in
>> >> >> > similar to digg.com?
>> >> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
>> experience
>> >> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
>> >> feature
>> >> >> > available at the server side.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and
>> two
>> >> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What you guys think?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks for the feedback!
>> >> >> > []s,
>> >> >> > Thiago.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
>> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> >> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> >> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
>> where
>> >> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Cheers
>> >> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> >> thiago@veronezi.org>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Guys,
>> >> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
>> webapp.
>> >> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
>> >> which
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
>> the
>> >> >> tomee
>> >> >> >> > log file.
>> >> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > What do you think?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> > Thiago.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
but we said we'll not use long polling so it should be fine ;)

- Romain


2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>

> No implementing client-side long polling in JavaScript might be
> causing issues...
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > what do you mean?
> >
> > clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh?
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >
> >> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
> >> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar
> >> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
> >> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...
> >>
> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29
> >>
> >> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that
> hangs
> >> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser
> should
> >> be
> >> > able to handle it.
> >> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load
> the
> >> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new
> interface
> >> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
> >> >
> >> >>> Eclipse RAP
> >> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely
> take
> >> a
> >> > look. Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >  Thiago.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> >> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> >> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> >> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> >> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does
> such
> >> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >> >>
> >> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse
> perspective/view
> >> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> >> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> >> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read
> the
> >> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating
> in
> >> >> > similar to digg.com?
> >> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> experience
> >> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> >> feature
> >> >> > available at the server side.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and
> two
> >> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What you guys think?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for the feedback!
> >> >> > []s,
> >> >> > Thiago.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <
> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer
> where
> >> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> >> Daniel
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> >> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Guys,
> >> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> webapp.
> >> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> >> which
> >> >> will
> >> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
> the
> >> >> tomee
> >> >> >> > log file.
> >> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > What do you think?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >> > Thiago.
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
No implementing client-side long polling in JavaScript might be
causing issues...

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what do you mean?
>
> clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh?
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>
>> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
>> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar
>> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
>> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29
>>
>> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> wrote:
>> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
>> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should
>> be
>> > able to handle it.
>> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
>> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
>> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
>> >
>> >>> Eclipse RAP
>> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take
>> a
>> > look. Thanks!
>> >
>> >  Thiago.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
>> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
>> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
>> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>> >>
>> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
>> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
>> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> >> >
>> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
>> >> > similar to digg.com?
>> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
>> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
>> feature
>> >> > available at the server side.
>> >> >
>> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
>> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> >> >
>> >> > What you guys think?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the feedback!
>> >> > []s,
>> >> > Thiago.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
>> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
>> thiago@veronezi.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Guys,
>> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
>> which
>> >> will
>> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
>> >> tomee
>> >> >> > log file.
>> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What do you think?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Thiago.
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
what do you mean?

clicking on a button causes perf issues more than real time refresh?

- Romain


2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>

> I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
> manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar
> server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
> client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29
>
> PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> wrote:
> > There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
> > longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should
> be
> > able to handle it.
> > To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
> > log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
> > is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
> >
> >>> Eclipse RAP
> > First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take
> a
> > look. Thanks!
> >
> >  Thiago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> >> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> >> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> >> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> >> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> >> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >>
> >> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> >> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> >> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> >> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> >> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >> >
> >> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> >> > similar to digg.com?
> >> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> >> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> feature
> >> > available at the server side.
> >> >
> >> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> >> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >> >
> >> > What you guys think?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the feedback!
> >> > []s,
> >> > Thiago.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> >> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers
> >> >> Daniel
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Guys,
> >> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> >> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> which
> >> will
> >> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> >> tomee
> >> >> > log file.
> >> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What do you think?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Thiago.
> >> >>
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
I like your proposed approach of first keep it simple and just have a
manual refresh button and then go with WebSocket, Comet [1] or similar
server-side push techniques. On the other hand I would avoid
client-side polling cause it might be causing performance issues...

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_%28programming%29

PS: IIRC RAP uses qooxdoo internally.

Cheers
Daniel

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> wrote:
> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should be
> able to handle it.
> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
>
>>> Eclipse RAP
> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take a
> look. Thanks!
>
>  Thiago.
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
>> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
>> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
>> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>>
>> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
>> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
>> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> >
>> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
>> > similar to digg.com?
>> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
>> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
>> > available at the server side.
>> >
>> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
>> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> >
>> > What you guys think?
>> >
>> > Thanks for the feedback!
>> > []s,
>> > Thiago.
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
>> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Guys,
>> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
>> will
>> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
>> tomee
>> >> > log file.
>> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >> >
>> >> > What do you think?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Thiago.
>> >>
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
nop :p

- Romain


2012/5/29 dsh <da...@googlemail.com>

> You are a troll again aren't you :D
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the
> logs)
> >
> > eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at
> > least)
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >
> >> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
> >> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser
> should be
> >> able to handle it.
> >> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
> >> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new
> interface
> >> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
> >>
> >> >> Eclipse RAP
> >> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely
> take a
> >> look. Thanks!
> >>
> >>  Thiago.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> >> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> >> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> >> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> >> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> >> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >> >
> >> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> >> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> >> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> >> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read
> the
> >> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >> > >
> >> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> >> > > similar to digg.com?
> >> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have
> experience
> >> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> >> feature
> >> > > available at the server side.
> >> > >
> >> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and
> two
> >> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> >> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >> > >
> >> > > What you guys think?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for the feedback!
> >> > > []s,
> >> > > Thiago.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <daniel.haischt@googlemail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> >> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Cheers
> >> > >> Daniel
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <
> thiago@veronezi.org
> >> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > Guys,
> >> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new
> webapp.
> >> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> which
> >> > will
> >> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
> the
> >> > tomee
> >> > >> > log file.
> >> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > What do you think?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Thanks,
> >> > >> > Thiago.
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
You are a troll again aren't you :D

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the logs)
>
> eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at
> least)
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
>> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
>> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should be
>> able to handle it.
>> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
>> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
>> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
>>
>> >> Eclipse RAP
>> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take a
>> look. Thanks!
>>
>>  Thiago.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
>> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
>> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
>> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
>> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
>> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>> >
>> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
>> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
>> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
>> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
>> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>> > >
>> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
>> > > similar to digg.com?
>> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
>> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
>> feature
>> > > available at the server side.
>> > >
>> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
>> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
>> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>> > >
>> > > What you guys think?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for the feedback!
>> > > []s,
>> > > Thiago.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
>> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers
>> > >> Daniel
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
>> >
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Guys,
>> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
>> > will
>> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
>> > tomee
>> > >> > log file.
>> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> > >> >
>> > >> > What do you think?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > Thiago.
>> > >>
>> >
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the logs)

eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at
least)

- Romain


2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should be
> able to handle it.
> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?
>
> >> Eclipse RAP
> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take a
> look. Thanks!
>
>  Thiago.
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
> >
> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> > >
> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > > similar to digg.com?
> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this
> feature
> > > available at the server side.
> > >
> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> > >
> > > What you guys think?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback!
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Daniel
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <thiago@veronezi.org
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Guys,
> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> > will
> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> > tomee
> > >> > log file.
> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Thiago.
> > >>
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs
longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser should be
able to handle it.
To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the
log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new interface
is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think?

>> Eclipse RAP
First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely take a
look. Thanks!

 Thiago.


On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
> framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
> abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
> capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
> not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
> abstraction... not sure about jQuery...
>
> PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
> concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
> overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
> lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> wrote:
> > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> > log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
> >
> >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> > similar to digg.com?
> > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
> > available at the server side.
> >
> > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> > extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
> >
> > What you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback!
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Guys,
> >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> will
> >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> tomee
> >> > log file.
> >> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >> >
> >> > What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Thiago.
> >>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the
framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting
abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the
capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would
not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such
abstraction... not sure about jQuery...

PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view
concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an
overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI
lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :)

Cheers
Daniel

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> wrote:
> Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>
>>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> similar to digg.com?
> Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
> available at the server side.
>
> I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>
> What you guys think?
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
>> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
>> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
>> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
>> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
>> > log file.
>> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
>> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Thiago.
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
it looks promising!

- Romain


2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
> log... which doesn't make sense. :O)
>
> >> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
> similar to digg.com?
> Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
> with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
> available at the server side.
>
> I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
> extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png
>
> What you guys think?
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> > have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> > messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> > new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> will
> > > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> tomee
> > > log file.
> > > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thiago.
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read the
log... which doesn't make sense. :O)

>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in
similar to digg.com?
Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have experience
with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this feature
available at the server side.

I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and two
extra panels (MDB and Webservices):
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png

What you guys think?

Thanks for the feedback!
[]s,
Thiago.

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> wrote:
> > Guys,
> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
> > log file.
> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thiago.
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by dsh <da...@googlemail.com>.
One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to
have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log
messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where
new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com?

Cheers
Daniel

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org> wrote:
> Guys,
> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
> log file.
> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Thiago.

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
+1

2012/5/29 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> wonder if we could add a logo :p
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>
> > That looks really great.
> > Nice to have feature Thiago
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> > 2012/5/29 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > I like and +1 for WebServices list and I'll raise you a RESTful
> services
> > > list :)
> > >
> > > It would be also awesome to list the MDBs by topic/queue name.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > On May 28, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > >
> > > > fine :)
> > > >
> > > > well having the list of webservices under the ejbs can be nice too
> > > >
> > > > - Romain
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > > >
> > > >> Of course I have your class in mind. :O)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - Romain
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Guys,
> > > >>>> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > > >>>> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one
> which
> > > >> will
> > > >>>> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and
> the
> > > >> tomee
> > > >>>> log file.
> > > >>>> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > >>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What do you think?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Thiago.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
wonder if we could add a logo :p

- Romain


2012/5/29 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>

> That looks really great.
> Nice to have feature Thiago
>
> Jean-Louis
>
> 2012/5/29 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > I like and +1 for WebServices list and I'll raise you a RESTful services
> > list :)
> >
> > It would be also awesome to list the MDBs by topic/queue name.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On May 28, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >
> > > fine :)
> > >
> > > well having the list of webservices under the ejbs can be nice too
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > >
> > >> Of course I have your class in mind. :O)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
> > >>>
> > >>> - Romain
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Guys,
> > >>>> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > >>>> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> > >> will
> > >>>> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> > >> tomee
> > >>>> log file.
> > >>>> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > >>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What do you think?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Thiago.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
That looks really great.
Nice to have feature Thiago

Jean-Louis

2012/5/29 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>

> I like and +1 for WebServices list and I'll raise you a RESTful services
> list :)
>
> It would be also awesome to list the MDBs by topic/queue name.
>
>
> -David
>
> On May 28, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> > fine :)
> >
> > well having the list of webservices under the ejbs can be nice too
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >
> >> Of course I have your class in mind. :O)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
> >>>
> >>> - Romain
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >>>
> >>>> Guys,
> >>>> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> >>>> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> >> will
> >>>> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> >> tomee
> >>>> log file.
> >>>> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> >>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Thiago.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
I like and +1 for WebServices list and I'll raise you a RESTful services list :)

It would be also awesome to list the MDBs by topic/queue name.


-David

On May 28, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

> fine :)
> 
> well having the list of webservices under the ejbs can be nice too
> 
> - Romain
> 
> 
> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> 
>> Of course I have your class in mind. :O)
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
>>> 
>>> - Romain
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>>> 
>>>> Guys,
>>>> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
>>>> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
>> will
>>>> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
>> tomee
>>>> log file.
>>>> Please check the mockup I created for it:
>>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Thiago.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
fine :)

well having the list of webservices under the ejbs can be nice too

- Romain


2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Of course I have your class in mind. :O)
>
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
> >
> > > Guys,
> > > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which
> will
> > > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the
> tomee
> > > log file.
> > > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Of course I have your class in mind. :O)


On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com>wrote:

> hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>
>
> > Guys,
> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
> > log file.
> > Please check the mockup I created for it:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thiago.
> >
>

Re: tomee webapp proposal

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
hmm, if you use the OpenEJBScripter +1

- Romain


2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>

> Guys,
> I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new webapp.
> Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one which will
> give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and the tomee
> log file.
> Please check the mockup I created for it:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Thiago.
>