You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/27 21:01:06 UTC
[DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of
a better forum.
[1]
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38
--
Hadrian Zbarcea
Principal Software Architect
Talend, Inc
http://coders.talend.com/
http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan
Thanks for the correction.
Unfortunatly git at Apache has more pages if you search, and you often
end up at that old git svn page
And not at that new page you posted.
For Camel committers read this page first:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Also note:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>
> has a lot of information to help get you started.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On May 6, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 6, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I don't think we are all set.
>>> There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
>>>
>>> IMHO the url should be as listed here
>>> http://git.apache.org/
>>
>> No, those are the read-only mirrors from the svn repo.
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git
>>
>> is the correct URL.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Christian Müller
>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>>> Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hz...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
>>>>> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
>>>>> site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it in
>>>>> the evening if no one beasts me to it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
>>>>>> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>>>>>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>>>>>>> got an
>>>>>>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>>>>>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://**git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/**asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>>>>>>> full test
>>>>>>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/********apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<****http**://code.google.com/a/****
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-** <http://code.google.com/a/**apache-**><
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.**com/a/apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/******issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/**apache-**extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> -----------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Twitter: davsclaus
>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Also note:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
has a lot of information to help get you started.
Dan
On May 6, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I don't think we are all set.
>> There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
>>
>> IMHO the url should be as listed here
>> http://git.apache.org/
>
> No, those are the read-only mirrors from the svn repo.
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git
>
> is the correct URL.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Christian Müller
>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> Sent from a mobile device
>>> Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hz...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
>>>> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
>>>> site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it in
>>>> the evening if no one beasts me to it.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
>>>>> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>>>>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>>>>>> got an
>>>>>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>>>>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>>> <https://**git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/**asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>>>>>> full test
>>>>>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/********apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<****http**://code.google.com/a/****
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-** <http://code.google.com/a/**apache-**><
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.**com/a/apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/******issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/**apache-**extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On May 6, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't think we are all set.
> There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
>
> IMHO the url should be as listed here
> http://git.apache.org/
No, those are the read-only mirrors from the svn repo.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git
is the correct URL.
Dan
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Christian Müller
> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device
>> Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hz...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
>>> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
>>> site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it in
>>> the evening if no one beasts me to it.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>
>>>> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
>>>> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>>>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>>>>> got an
>>>>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>>>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>> <https://**git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/**asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>>>>> full test
>>>>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/********apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<****http**://code.google.com/a/****
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-** <http://code.google.com/a/**apache-**><
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.**com/a/apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/******issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/**apache-**extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I don't think we are all set.
There is confusing of the *correct* url to be used.
IMHO the url should be as listed here
http://git.apache.org/
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Christian Müller
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
>
> Christian
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hz...@gmail.com>:
>
>> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
>> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
>> site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it in
>> the evening if no one beasts me to it.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>
>>> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
>>> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>>>
>>>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>>>> got an
>>>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>> <https://**git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/**asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>>> >looks
>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>>>> full test
>>>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/********apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<****http**://code.google.com/a/****
>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-** <http://code.google.com/a/**apache-**><
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.**com/a/apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/******issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/**apache-**extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hadrian, you are welcome to announce it.
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 06.05.2013 19:18 schrieb "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hz...@gmail.com>:
> All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
> experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
> site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it in
> the evening if no one beasts me to it.
>
> Cheers
> Hadrian
>
>
> On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
>> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
>> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>>
>>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>>
>>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>>> got an
>>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/****repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>> <https://**git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/**asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>
>>>>>> >looks
>>>>>> good to
>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>>> full test
>>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/********apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<****http**://code.google.com/a/****
>>>>>>>>>>> apache-** <http://code.google.com/a/**apache-**><
>>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.**com/a/apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/******issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/**apache-**extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>>>>>>>>> extra/**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
All set. We are officially running on git now. Please shout if you
experience any issues. Christian, do you want to announce it on the main
site or you want me to? We need to start updating the site, I'll do it
in the evening if no one beasts me to it.
Cheers
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 11:33 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
> shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
>
> Hadrian
>
> On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>>
>> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller
>> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>>
>>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I
>>> got an
>>> exception. There is also no explanation at
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Git repo at
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>looks
>>>>> good to
>>>>> me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My
>>>>>> full test
>>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
>>>>>> supporting
>>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if
>>>>>> infra asks
>>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>> <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think
>>>>>>>>> most of
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the
>>>>>>>>>> choice.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it
>>>>>>>>>> for lack
>>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<**http**://code.google.com/a/**apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**
>>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
I added a comment to the INFRA jira, we should be back in business
shortly. Thanks for everybody's patience.
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 09:47 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
>
> On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>>
>> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I got an
>> exception. There is also no explanation at https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
>> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>looks good to
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
>>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for supporting
>>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
>>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<**http**://code.google.com/a/**apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**
>>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
Cloned nicely. (And danged fast).
On May 6, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
>
> I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I got an
> exception. There is also no explanation at https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
> Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>
>>> Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>looks good to
>>> me.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
>>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for supporting
>>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>>
>>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
>>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<**http**://code.google.com/a/**apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**
>>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
The Git repository looks good to me too (master, branches, tags).
I tried to update our CI builds to use our new Git repository, but I got an
exception. There is also no explanation at https://git-wip-us.apache.org.
Could someone try whether he has more luck than me...
Best,
Christian
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>
>> Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/camel.git<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git>looks good to
>> me.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
>>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for supporting
>>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>>
>>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
>>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of
>>>>>> us
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>>> and as
>>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>>>>> of a
>>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/******apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>> <h**ttp://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<**http**://code.google.com/a/**apache-**<http://code.google.com/a/apache-**>
>>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/****issues/detail?id=38<http://extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/a/apache-**extras.org/p/camel-extra/**
>>>>>>> issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jon. Could we please get another nod?
Hadrian
On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
> Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git looks good to
> me.
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
>> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
>> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
>> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for supporting
>> the release and I can take care of that.
>>
>> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
>> committers comfortable with the change?
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>
>>
>> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
>>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>
>>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>>> and as
>>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>>>> of a
>>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http**://code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com>.
Git repo at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/camel.git looks good to
me.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
> infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full test
> over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
> completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for supporting
> the release and I can take care of that.
>
> Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
> committers comfortable with the change?
>
> Hadrian
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>
>
> On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
>> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
>> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hadrian
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6197<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197>
>>
>>
>> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>
>>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>>
>>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>>> and as
>>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>>> of a
>>>>> better forum.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/****apache-extras.org/p/camel-**<http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**>
>>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http**://code.google.com/a/apache-**
>>>>> extras.org/p/camel-extra/**issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
--
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: janstey@redhat.com
Web: http://redhat.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
The migration is done. It looks ok to me and I would recommend asking
infra to make the git repo writable and close the issue [1]. My full
test over the weekend failed, but the problem was with our tests. After
completing the migration there are a few changes necessary for
supporting the release and I can take care of that.
Do we need to give more time for testing the repo, or we have enough
committers comfortable with the change?
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197
On 04/24/2013 04:36 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
> for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197
>
>
> On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>>> Hi Hadrian!
>>>
>>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>>
>>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1]
>>>> and as
>>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>>> of a
>>>> better forum.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
>>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>>> Principal Software Architect
>>>> Talend, Inc
>>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Actually, we may save some time and skip a vote, let's see if infra asks
for one. I created an issue for infra as a first step [1].
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6197
On 04/24/2013 03:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
> Hadrian
>
> On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
>> Hi Hadrian!
>>
>> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>
>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack
>>> of a
>>> better forum.
>>>
>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>> Principal Software Architect
>>> Talend, Inc
>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Will do. Let's start with a formal vote.
Hadrian
On 04/24/2013 03:51 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
> Hi Hadrian!
>
> Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>
>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
>> better forum.
>>
>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>
>> --
>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>> Principal Software Architect
>> Talend, Inc
>> http://coders.talend.com/
>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi Hadrian!
Do you consider to drive this topic after you collect many +1? ;-)
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
> better forum.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Raúl.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Henryk Konsek <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
> >
> > +1 for ASF, +1 for Extra
> >
> > --
> > Henryk Konsek
> > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
> >
>
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>.
+1.
Raúl.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Henryk Konsek <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> +1 for ASF, +1 for Extra
>
> --
> Henryk Konsek
> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Henryk Konsek <he...@gmail.com>.
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
+1 for ASF, +1 for Extra
--
Henryk Konsek
http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Willem jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
+1 for moving to git.
For the svn maven repo, I just have a quick look the artifacts, I don't think we need them any more.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Inline.
> Hadrian
>
> On 03/28/2013 09:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller <christian.mueller@gmail.com (mailto:christian.mueller@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >
> > > Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
> > >
> > > In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
> > > remember...).
> > >
> > > It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
> > > are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of them.
> > > But what's with our sandbox project/module? Do we have to move it into
> > > trunk?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-force-switching-from-SVN-to-GIT-td5715773.html
> > > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/scripts/
> >
> >
> >
> > These could just go in trunk/release_scripts or something. Either that or just thrown away. The publish_camel_distro.sh (http://publish_camel_distro.sh) script certainly is wrong now.
> Not used in ages. Relics from camel as an activemq subproject. New
> working versions exist at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/etc/scripts/
>
> >
> > > [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/website/
> >
> > This would likely need to stay for now.
> Right
>
> >
> > > [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/sandbox/
> >
> > No idea on this.
> Not needed imho, because with git/github there are other ways to
> collaborate and share. Again, imho.
>
> >
> > > [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/
> >
> > I hope this isn't actually being used. If it is, this needs to be fixed ASAP. I think INFRA has announced in may that all the "m2-repo" things in svn will be disabled in May. If there is anything left in there that is needed, it NEEDS to get pushed to central.
> Not needed anymore, afaik, but will check to make sure. In any event, if
> used, it must be resolved asap, regardless of a move to git.
>
> >
> > > [6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/ide/
> >
> > Discarded. Has been touched in 5 years.
> True.
>
> >
> > All of this remains in SVN's history forever so not a big deal. If we ever need any of it back, it will always be there.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com (mailto:hzbarcea@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > > > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
> > > >
> > > > Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> > > > much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
> > > > better forum.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> > > > extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hadrian Zbarcea
> > > > Principal Software Architect
> > > > Talend, Inc
> > > > http://coders.talend.com/
> > > > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Inline.
Hadrian
On 03/28/2013 09:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
>>
>> In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
>> remember...).
>>
>> It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
>> are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of them.
>> But what's with our sandbox project/module? Do we have to move it into
>> trunk?
>>
>> [1]
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-force-switching-from-SVN-to-GIT-td5715773.html
>> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/scripts/
>
> These could just go in trunk/release_scripts or something. Either that or just thrown away. The publish_camel_distro.sh script certainly is wrong now.
Not used in ages. Relics from camel as an activemq subproject. New
working versions exist at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/etc/scripts/
>
>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/website/
>
> This would likely need to stay for now.
Right
>
>> [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/sandbox/
>
> No idea on this.
Not needed imho, because with git/github there are other ways to
collaborate and share. Again, imho.
>
>> [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/
>
> I hope this isn't actually being used. If it is, this needs to be fixed ASAP. I think INFRA has announced in may that all the "m2-repo" things in svn will be disabled in May. If there is anything left in there that is needed, it NEEDS to get pushed to central.
Not needed anymore, afaik, but will check to make sure. In any event, if
used, it must be resolved asap, regardless of a move to git.
>
>> [6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/ide/
>
> Discarded. Has been touched in 5 years.
True.
>
> All of this remains in SVN's history forever so not a big deal. If we ever need any of it back, it will always be there.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>>
>>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
>>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
>>> better forum.
>>>
>>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
>>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>>> Principal Software Architect
>>> Talend, Inc
>>> http://coders.talend.com/
>>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
>
> In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
> remember...).
>
> It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
> are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of them.
> But what's with our sandbox project/module? Do we have to move it into
> trunk?
>
> [1]
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-force-switching-from-SVN-to-GIT-td5715773.html
> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/scripts/
These could just go in trunk/release_scripts or something. Either that or just thrown away. The publish_camel_distro.sh script certainly is wrong now.
> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/website/
This would likely need to stay for now.
> [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/sandbox/
No idea on this.
> [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/
I hope this isn't actually being used. If it is, this needs to be fixed ASAP. I think INFRA has announced in may that all the "m2-repo" things in svn will be disabled in May. If there is anything left in there that is needed, it NEEDS to get pushed to central.
> [6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/ide/
Discarded. Has been touched in 5 years.
All of this remains in SVN's history forever so not a big deal. If we ever need any of it back, it will always be there.
Dan
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
>> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>>
>> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
>> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
>> better forum.
>>
>> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
>> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>>
>> --
>> Hadrian Zbarcea
>> Principal Software Architect
>> Talend, Inc
>> http://coders.talend.com/
>> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-)
In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can
remember...).
It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which
are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of them.
But what's with our sandbox project/module? Do we have to move it into
trunk?
[1]
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-force-switching-from-SVN-to-GIT-td5715773.html
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/scripts/
[3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/website/
[4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/sandbox/
[5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/
[6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/ide/
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
> better forum.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, sounds fine. That would eliminate the sometimes annoying delay
between svn and git mirror.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
> better forum.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>
--
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: janstey@redhat.com
Web: http://redhat.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
sounds good
On 27 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a better forum.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38
>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Scott England-Sullivan <su...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
> >
>
> +1
>
> >
> > Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> > much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of
> a
> > better forum.
> >
> > [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> > extra/issues/detail?id=38<
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hadrian Zbarcea
> > Principal Software Architect
> > Talend, Inc
> > http://coders.talend.com/
> > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
--
Scott England-Sullivan
Apache Camel Committer
Principal Consultant / Sr. Architect | Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: fusesource.com <http://www.fusesource.com> |
redhat.com<http://www.redhat.com>
Blog: sully6768.blogspot.com
Twitter: sully6768
Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo
Posted by Chris Geer <ch...@cxtsoftware.com>.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us
> already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice.
>
+1
>
> Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as
> much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a
> better forum.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-**
> extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38>
>
> --
> Hadrian Zbarcea
> Principal Software Architect
> Talend, Inc
> http://coders.talend.com/
> http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
>