You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Stefan Pflumm <St...@web.de> on 2006/01/23 21:36:48 UTC
Re: fop 0.91: keep-with-previous
Hi,
Thank's for the help, but i use "keep-with-previous" in other parts of my document which couldn't replaced easely with keep-with-next.
So will "keep-with-previous" for table rows reimplemented in the next beta version?
fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org schrieb am 17.01.06 23:01:12:
That's a known issue documented in the release notes:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.91+beta
I can see that you're only using the table here because of the
work-around for keeps in 0.20.5. You can actually remove that table for
0.91beta now because keeps work on normal blocks, even
keep-with-previous. keep-with-previous just doesn't work inside tables
and lists, yet. The other option is to use keep-with-next instead of
keep-with-previous if possible. And it looks like it is possible in your
case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: fop 0.91: keep-with-previous
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.
It's not on my high-priority list and as far as I can remember from when
I implemented the layout manager code for tables, this is a non-trivial
task. So unless someone else does it or my priorities change, I guess
the next release will still have this limitation.
Did you understand my suggestion about removing the blind table (keep
work-around)?
On 23.01.2006 21:36:48 Stefan Pflumm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank's for the help, but i use "keep-with-previous" in other parts of my document which couldn't replaced easely with keep-with-next.
> So will "keep-with-previous" for table rows reimplemented in the next beta version?
>
> fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org schrieb am 17.01.06 23:01:12:
>
> That's a known issue documented in the release notes:
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html#FOP+0.91+beta
>
> I can see that you're only using the table here because of the
> work-around for keeps in 0.20.5. You can actually remove that table for
> 0.91beta now because keeps work on normal blocks, even
> keep-with-previous. keep-with-previous just doesn't work inside tables
> and lists, yet. The other option is to use keep-with-next instead of
> keep-with-previous if possible. And it looks like it is possible in your
> case.
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org