You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/10 14:55:26 UTC
V 1.0 getting close... Logotype?
Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer to
1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was that
settled?) and logotype discussions before.
I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently in
the header
Cheers!
Re: V 1.0 getting close... Logotype?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
@logo:
i hope we will see some nice suggestions soon (see [1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-520
2014-02-10 15:03 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>:
> +1 John
> +1 for using the logo in the header
>
>
> 2014-02-10 14:59 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Project name was already established as a part of graduation. Unless
> > we see a need to have a rename, we should stick with it (a good
> > example of why a rename is needed is OpenEJB -> TomEE).
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer
> to
> > > 1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was
> that
> > > settled?) and logotype discussions before.
> > >
> > > I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently
> > in
> > > the header
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> >
>
Re: V 1.0 getting close... Logotype?
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 John
+1 for using the logo in the header
2014-02-10 14:59 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
> Project name was already established as a part of graduation. Unless
> we see a need to have a rename, we should stick with it (a good
> example of why a rename is needed is OpenEJB -> TomEE).
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer to
> > 1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was that
> > settled?) and logotype discussions before.
> >
> > I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently
> in
> > the header
> >
> > Cheers!
>
Re: V 1.0 getting close... Logotype?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Project name was already established as a part of graduation. Unless
we see a need to have a rename, we should stick with it (a good
example of why a rename is needed is OpenEJB -> TomEE).
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello! By following the discussions you seem to draw closer and closer to
> 1.0. I think it would be appropriate to end the project name (or was that
> settled?) and logotype discussions before.
>
> I myself is -1 for name change and +1 for the logotype that's currently in
> the header
>
> Cheers!