Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the auxiliary pages?


If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What happens if
you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area where I
could respond to the message.

There are various options:

1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
pages
3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message page.
Maybe hide it at first
4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the message.

D.

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

already dropped the tabs on pools. The user/contacts page is the last one is
tabs.

D.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I mean the pages which used to have tabs like pools and contacts/user
> profile.
> Or should we just drop the tabs?
>
>
>
> On 9. apr. 2010, at 17.14, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>
> > Do you mean the user tabs?
> >
> > Right now, we have to put Ethan's word wrap solution on all these pages.
> > Long messages kill our UI.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> yojibee@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Cool, thanks!
> >>
> >> Do you want to start the pages with tabs or should I?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 April 2010 14:18, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fixed, committed and deployed on stax
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> >> yojibee@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> >>>> yojibee@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> >>>>>> These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> >>>>>> functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> >>>>>> something
> >>>>>> a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So my +1 goes to:
> >>>>>> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> >>>> auxiliary
> >>>>>> pages
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> My thinking exactly ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> /Anne
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the
> >>> auxiliary
> >>>>>>> pages?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
> >>>>> happens
> >>>>>> if
> >>>>>>> you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area
> >>>> where
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>> could respond to the message.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There are various options:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> >>>>>>> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> >>>>> auxiliary
> >>>>>>> pages
> >>>>>>> 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message
> >>>> page.
> >>>>>>> Maybe hide it at first
> >>>>>>> 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the
> >>> message.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> D.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

I mean the pages which used to have tabs like pools and contacts/user profile.
Or should we just drop the tabs?



On 9. apr. 2010, at 17.14, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> Do you mean the user tabs?
> 
> Right now, we have to put Ethan's word wrap solution on all these pages.
> Long messages kill our UI.
> 
> D.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Cool, thanks!
>> 
>> Do you want to start the pages with tabs or should I?
>> 
>> 
>> On 9 April 2010 14:18, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Fixed, committed and deployed on stax
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
>> yojibee@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
>>>> yojibee@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
>>>>>> These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
>>>>>> functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So my +1 goes to:
>>>>>> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
>>>> auxiliary
>>>>>> pages
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> My thinking exactly ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> /Anne
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the
>>> auxiliary
>>>>>>> pages?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
>>>>> happens
>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area
>>>> where
>>>>> I
>>>>>>> could respond to the message.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are various options:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
>>>>>>> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
>>>>> auxiliary
>>>>>>> pages
>>>>>>> 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message
>>>> page.
>>>>>>> Maybe hide it at first
>>>>>>> 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the
>>> message.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Do you mean the user tabs?

Right now, we have to put Ethan's word wrap solution on all these pages.
Long messages kill our UI.

D.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Cool, thanks!
>
> Do you want to start the pages with tabs or should I?
>
>
> On 9 April 2010 14:18, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Fixed, committed and deployed on stax
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> yojibee@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> > > yojibee@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> > > > > These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> > > > > functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> > > > > something
> > > > > a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
> > > > >
> > > > > So my +1 goes to:
> > > > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> > > auxiliary
> > > > > pages
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
> > > >
> > >
> > > My thinking exactly ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > /Anne
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the
> > auxiliary
> > > > > > pages?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
> > > > happens
> > > > > if
> > > > > > you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area
> > > where
> > > > I
> > > > > > could respond to the message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are various options:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> > > > > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> > > > auxiliary
> > > > > > pages
> > > > > > 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message
> > > page.
> > > > > > Maybe hide it at first
> > > > > > 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the
> > message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > D.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

Cool, thanks!

Do you want to start the pages with tabs or should I?


On 9 April 2010 14:18, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fixed, committed and deployed on stax
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> > yojibee@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> > > > These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> > > > functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> > > > something
> > > > a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
> > > >
> > > > So my +1 goes to:
> > > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> > auxiliary
> > > > pages
> > > >
> > >
> > > My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
> > >
> >
> > My thinking exactly ;-)
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > /Anne
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the
> auxiliary
> > > > > pages?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
> > > happens
> > > > if
> > > > > you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area
> > where
> > > I
> > > > > could respond to the message.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are various options:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> > > > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> > > auxiliary
> > > > > pages
> > > > > 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message
> > page.
> > > > > Maybe hide it at first
> > > > > 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the
> message.
> > > > >
> > > > > D.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

Fixed, committed and deployed on stax

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <
> yojibee@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> > > These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> > > functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> > > something
> > > a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
> > >
> > > So my +1 goes to:
> > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> auxiliary
> > > pages
> > >
> >
> > My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
> >
>
> My thinking exactly ;-)
>
>
> >
> >
> > > /Anne
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the auxiliary
> > > > pages?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
> > happens
> > > if
> > > > you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area
> where
> > I
> > > > could respond to the message.
> > > >
> > > > There are various options:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> > > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> > auxiliary
> > > > pages
> > > > 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message
> page.
> > > > Maybe hide it at first
> > > > 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the message.
> > > >
> > > > D.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

On 9 April 2010 13:09, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yojibee@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> > These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> > functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> > something
> > a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
> >
> > So my +1 goes to:
> > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
> > pages
> >
>
> My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->
>

My thinking exactly ;-)


>
>
> > /Anne
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the auxiliary
> > > pages?
> > >
> > >
> > > If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What
> happens
> > if
> > > you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area where
> I
> > > could respond to the message.
> > >
> > > There are various options:
> > >
> > > 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> > > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these
> auxiliary
> > > pages
> > > 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message page.
> > > Maybe hide it at first
> > > 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the message.
> > >
> > > D.
> > >
> >
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
> These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
> functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be
> something
> a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.
>
> So my +1 goes to:
> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
> pages
>

My suggestion as well. Deleting code is really easy :->


> /Anne
>
>
>
> On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the auxiliary
> > pages?
> >
> >
> > If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What happens
> if
> > you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area where I
> > could respond to the message.
> >
> > There are various options:
> >
> > 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> > 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
> > pages
> > 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message page.
> > Maybe hide it at first
> > 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the message.
> >
> > D.
> >
>

Re: Resend + reply functionality on public / streams

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

I think we should remove resend/reply on the auxiliary pages.
These pages are only meant for discovery anyway. I think such a
functionality (to reply from a conversation for instance) would be something
a client, not the web client, would handle a lot better.

So my +1 goes to:
2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
pages

/Anne



On 9 April 2010 10:10, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What do want to do with resend / reply functionality on the auxiliary
> pages?
>
>
> If you look at the public page, you see a list of messages. What happens if
> you want to reply to a message? There is currently no update area where I
> could respond to the message.
>
> There are various options:
>
> 1. Send people to the main page where they can reply
> 2. Delete this functionality from the message streams on these auxiliary
> pages
> 3. Add the update box as we currently have it on the main message page.
> Maybe hide it at first
> 4. New UI element that allows you to reply right next to the message.
>
> D.
>