You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to rivet-dev@tcl.apache.org by "David N. Welton" <da...@dedasys.com> on 2004/01/17 16:32:50 UTC
Re: load_response.tcl - vote?
Hi,
Should we have a vote on what to do about load_response? We have
several options:
1) Leave it like it was.
2) Leave the current version which unsets the array.
3) Do not unset the array, but raise an error if it is called a second
time.
I prefer these in the order 2, 3, 1, but I could be convinced that #3
is right if there is a lot of NWS code that #2 would break.
Thanks,
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org
Re: load_response.tcl - vote?
Posted by Andy Doerr <an...@swbell.net>.
Leave it as it is (unset the array)
Documentation should reflect that it will clear any values already existing?
David N. Welton wrote:
> I want to be clear: leave it like it *was* or like it *is? The
> version currently in CVS does unset the array.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org
Re: load_response.tcl - vote?
Posted by "David N. Welton" <da...@dedasys.com>.
I want to be clear: leave it like it *was* or like it *is? The
version currently in CVS does unset the array.
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org
Re: load_response.tcl - vote?
Posted by Andy Doerr <an...@swbell.net>.
I agree, leave it as it is.
Damon Courtney wrote:
>>Should we have a vote on what to do about load_response? We have
>>several options:
>>
>>1) Leave it like it was.
>>
>>2) Leave the current version which unsets the array.
>>
>>3) Do not unset the array, but raise an error if it is called a second
>> time.
>>
>>I prefer these in the order 2, 3, 1, but I could be convinced that #3
>>is right if there is a lot of NWS code that #2 would break.
>
>
> Leave it as it is now. I think it's the best solution.
>
> D
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org
Re: load_response.tcl - vote?
Posted by Damon Courtney <da...@your.unreality.com>.
> Should we have a vote on what to do about load_response? We have
> several options:
>
> 1) Leave it like it was.
>
> 2) Leave the current version which unsets the array.
>
> 3) Do not unset the array, but raise an error if it is called a second
> time.
>
> I prefer these in the order 2, 3, 1, but I could be convinced that #3
> is right if there is a lot of NWS code that #2 would break.
Leave it as it is now. I think it's the best solution.
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: rivet-dev-unsubscribe@tcl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rivet-dev-help@tcl.apache.org