You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by co...@apache.org on 1998/05/28 21:34:23 UTC

Re: os-windows/1623: Buffering of script output is not switched off

[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]


Synopsis: Buffering of script output is not switched off

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-feedback
State-Changed-By: coar
State-Changed-When: Thu May 28 12:34:22 PDT 1998
State-Changed-Why:
[This is a standard response.]
This Apache problem report has not been updated recently.
Please reply to this message if you have any additional
information about this issue, or if you have answers to
any questions that have been posed to you.  If there are
no outstanding questions, please consider this a request
to try to reproduce the problem with the latest software
release, if one has been made since last contact.  If we
don't hear from you, this report will be closed.


Re: os-windows/1623: Buffering of script output is not switched off

Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> Hang on a sec.  Why would you think that you should close the PR if they
> don't respond?  "standard responses" are great, but they are far too easy
> to just apply everywhere without looking at the problem.  Just because a
> PR hasn't been updated in a while doesn't mean the submitter has to do
> anything.
> 
> This, for example, is a known problem caused by known things.

And from what I've been reading (though possibly misunderstanding)
it was recently addressed.  If I'm mistaken, fine - but I made the
best judgement call I could.

If someone's going to run our beta software, I don't think it's
unreasonable to ask them to upgrade to the latest version to verify
the continuance/fix of the issue.  Non-beta, yes - but "beta" is
the first word of "beta-test."

#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar                    <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/>
Apache Group member         <http://www.apache.org/>
"Apache Server for Dummies" <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/ASFD/>

Re: os-windows/1623: Buffering of script output is not switched off

Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>.
Hang on a sec.  Why would you think that you should close the PR if they
don't respond?  "standard responses" are great, but they are far too easy
to just apply everywhere without looking at the problem.  Just because a
PR hasn't been updated in a while doesn't mean the submitter has to do
anything.

This, for example, is a known problem caused by known things.

On 28 May 1998 coar@apache.org wrote:

> [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
> [you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
> [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
> [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
> 
> 
> Synopsis: Buffering of script output is not switched off
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-feedback
> State-Changed-By: coar
> State-Changed-When: Thu May 28 12:34:22 PDT 1998
> State-Changed-Why:
> [This is a standard response.]
> This Apache problem report has not been updated recently.
> Please reply to this message if you have any additional
> information about this issue, or if you have answers to
> any questions that have been posed to you.  If there are
> no outstanding questions, please consider this a request
> to try to reproduce the problem with the latest software
> release, if one has been made since last contact.  If we
> don't hear from you, this report will be closed.
>