You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by marotosg <ma...@gmail.com> on 2017/12/01 19:32:19 UTC

Java 9 and Solr 6.6

HI all.

Would you recommend installing Solr 6.6.1 with Java 9 for a production
environement?


Thanks,
Sergio



--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Java 9 and Solr 6.6

Posted by Sergio García Maroto <ma...@gmail.com>.
Thanks. Very clear not to go with java 9.

On 2 December 2017 at 00:37, Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 12/1/2017 12:32 PM, marotosg wrote:
> > Would you recommend installing Solr 6.6.1 with Java 9 for a production
> > environement?
>
> Solr 7.x has been tested with Java 9 and should work with no problems.
> I believe that code changes were required to achieve this compatibility,
> so 6.6 might have issues with Java 9.
>
> The release information for 6.6 only mentions Java 8, while the release
> information for 7.0 explicitly says that it works with Java 9.
>
> I would not try running 6.6 with Java 9 in production without first
> testing every part of the implementation on a dev server ... and based
> on the limited information I know about, I'm not confident that those
> tests would pass.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>

Re: Java 9 and Solr 6.6

Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 12/1/2017 12:32 PM, marotosg wrote:
> Would you recommend installing Solr 6.6.1 with Java 9 for a production
> environement?

Solr 7.x has been tested with Java 9 and should work with no problems. 
I believe that code changes were required to achieve this compatibility,
so 6.6 might have issues with Java 9.

The release information for 6.6 only mentions Java 8, while the release
information for 7.0 explicitly says that it works with Java 9.

I would not try running 6.6 with Java 9 in production without first
testing every part of the implementation on a dev server ... and based
on the limited information I know about, I'm not confident that those
tests would pass.

Thanks,
Shawn