You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2018/03/02 19:25:13 UTC
"Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Hi,
now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the real
tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for vivid,
and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and make
starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set could
be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown (like the
one in our Royale logo).
In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example we'll be
writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the code
things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
things that wire all together are as well important so people know we work
all from various sides and try to get the best.
Let me know what do you think about it
Thanks!
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Carlos,
Thanks for clarification :) That's sounds good! :)
2018-03-06 12:31 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> for compiler I expect to solve (if I can, since is not my conformt zone and
> I need to see what can I do) bugs in CSS.
> Don't see anything that not should go directly to develop since should be
> commits solving concrete issues (like #25, and #26)
>
> In the other hand, my work will be in 3 concrete projects that are isolated
> from the rest (Jewel, JewelTheme, and JewelExample)
> those projects are still "incubating", so deserves a branch and the work
> will be there, although right now are safe, but I think it should not be in
> the 0.9.2 release (not like compiler bugs or enhancements)
>
> In the case this change in the future, we can adapt to the change, but I
> think is not good to put things before it happens, and for me is more quick
> not to need to update 3 branches against develop when only one is needed.
>
>
>
>
> 2018-03-06 12:05 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Are you saying that you will be working using develop in case of
> compiler,
> > but in case of asjs on the separate new branch ?
> >
> > Thanks, Piotr
> >
> > 2018-03-06 11:58 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
> > > I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
> > > Jewel.
> > > So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
> > > branches.
> > > If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to develop
> > > since normaly it would be a bug and not part of something new
> > > This is all good to ease the work since the refactor now was simple and
> > > maybe later could be a problem
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-03-02 23:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
> > > > preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to
> > collaborate
> > > > :).
> > > >
> > > > Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
> > > > matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but
> in
> > > the
> > > > end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as
> > people
> > > > using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
> > > >
> > > > but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and
> > as
> > > > well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
> >:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Carlos,
> > > >>
> > > >> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something
> awesome
> > > and
> > > >> I
> > > >> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that.
> User
> > > can
> > > >> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have
> > > this
> > > >> one:
> > > >>
> > > >> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could
> > > also
> > > >> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in
> my
> > > >> app.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a
> > > branch, I
> > > >> > think all this work will no affect that.
> > > >> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend
> make
> > > the
> > > >> > renaming, but all in the branch.
> > > >> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days,
> we
> > > can
> > > >> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that
> > > time I
> > > >> > could ask you and see what we can't do
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or
> the
> > > >> next
> > > >> > > release?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -Alex
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
> Carlos
> > > >> > Rovira"
> > > >> > > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >Hi,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start
> making
> > > the
> > > >> > real
> > > >> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main
> concept
> > > for
> > > >> > > >vivid,
> > > >> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking
> > and
> > > >> make
> > > >> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this
> UI
> > > set
> > > >> > > >could
> > > >> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a
> crown
> > > >> (like
> > > >> > > >the
> > > >> > > >one in our Royale logo).
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for
> example
> > > >> we'll
> > > >> > be
> > > >> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript,
> but
> > > more
> > > >> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side"
> from
> > > the
> > > >> > code
> > > >> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and
> all
> > > the
> > > >> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people
> > know
> > > we
> > > >> > work
> > > >> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >Thanks!
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >--
> > > >> > > >Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > >> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> > > >> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > > >> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> > > >> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > >> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
> > > >> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%
> > > 2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >>
> > > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Piotr,
for compiler I expect to solve (if I can, since is not my conformt zone and
I need to see what can I do) bugs in CSS.
Don't see anything that not should go directly to develop since should be
commits solving concrete issues (like #25, and #26)
In the other hand, my work will be in 3 concrete projects that are isolated
from the rest (Jewel, JewelTheme, and JewelExample)
those projects are still "incubating", so deserves a branch and the work
will be there, although right now are safe, but I think it should not be in
the 0.9.2 release (not like compiler bugs or enhancements)
In the case this change in the future, we can adapt to the change, but I
think is not good to put things before it happens, and for me is more quick
not to need to update 3 branches against develop when only one is needed.
2018-03-06 12:05 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Are you saying that you will be working using develop in case of compiler,
> but in case of asjs on the separate new branch ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-03-06 11:58 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
> > I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
> > Jewel.
> > So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
> > branches.
> > If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to develop
> > since normaly it would be a bug and not part of something new
> > This is all good to ease the work since the refactor now was simple and
> > maybe later could be a problem
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-02 23:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
> > > preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to
> collaborate
> > > :).
> > >
> > > Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
> > > matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but in
> > the
> > > end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as
> people
> > > using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
> > >
> > > but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and
> as
> > > well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
> > >
> > > Thanks! :)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> Hi Carlos,
> > >>
> > >> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something awesome
> > and
> > >> I
> > >> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
> > >>
> > >> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that. User
> > can
> > >> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have
> > this
> > >> one:
> > >>
> > >> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could
> > also
> > >> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in my
> > >> app.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Piotr
> > >>
> > >> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Alex,
> > >> >
> > >> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a
> > branch, I
> > >> > think all this work will no affect that.
> > >> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make
> > the
> > >> > renaming, but all in the branch.
> > >> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we
> > can
> > >> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that
> > time I
> > >> > could ask you and see what we can't do
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the
> > >> next
> > >> > > release?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Alex
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > >> > Rovira"
> > >> > > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making
> > the
> > >> > real
> > >> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept
> > for
> > >> > > >vivid,
> > >> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking
> and
> > >> make
> > >> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI
> > set
> > >> > > >could
> > >> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown
> > >> (like
> > >> > > >the
> > >> > > >one in our Royale logo).
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example
> > >> we'll
> > >> > be
> > >> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but
> > more
> > >> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from
> > the
> > >> > code
> > >> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all
> > the
> > >> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people
> know
> > we
> > >> > work
> > >> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Thanks!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >--
> > >> > > >Carlos Rovira
> > >> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> > >> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > >> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> > >> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > >> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
> > >> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%
> > 2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carlos,
Are you saying that you will be working using develop in case of compiler,
but in case of asjs on the separate new branch ?
Thanks, Piotr
2018-03-06 11:58 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
> I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
> Jewel.
> So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
> branches.
> If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to develop
> since normaly it would be a bug and not part of something new
> This is all good to ease the work since the refactor now was simple and
> maybe later could be a problem
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
> 2018-03-02 23:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
> > preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to collaborate
> > :).
> >
> > Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
> > matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but in
> the
> > end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as people
> > using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
> >
> > but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and as
> > well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
> >
> > Thanks! :)
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something awesome
> and
> >> I
> >> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
> >>
> >> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that. User
> can
> >> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have
> this
> >> one:
> >>
> >> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could
> also
> >> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in my
> >> app.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> > Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a
> branch, I
> >> > think all this work will no affect that.
> >> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make
> the
> >> > renaming, but all in the branch.
> >> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we
> can
> >> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that
> time I
> >> > could ask you and see what we can't do
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >> >
> >> > > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the
> >> next
> >> > > release?
> >> > >
> >> > > -Alex
> >> > >
> >> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >> > Rovira"
> >> > > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making
> the
> >> > real
> >> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept
> for
> >> > > >vivid,
> >> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and
> >> make
> >> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI
> set
> >> > > >could
> >> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown
> >> (like
> >> > > >the
> >> > > >one in our Royale logo).
> >> > > >
> >> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example
> >> we'll
> >> > be
> >> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but
> more
> >> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from
> the
> >> > code
> >> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all
> the
> >> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people know
> we
> >> > work
> >> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Thanks!
> >> > > >
> >> > > >--
> >> > > >Carlos Rovira
> >> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> >> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
> >> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%
> 2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Carlos Rovira
> >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
Jewel.
So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
branches.
If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to develop
since normaly it would be a bug and not part of something new
This is all good to ease the work since the refactor now was simple and
maybe later could be a problem
thanks
Carlos
2018-03-02 23:52 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
> preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to collaborate
> :).
>
> Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
> matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but in the
> end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as people
> using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
>
> but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and as
> well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>
> 2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something awesome and
>> I
>> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
>>
>> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that. User can
>> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have this
>> one:
>>
>> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could also
>> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in my
>> app.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a branch, I
>> > think all this work will no affect that.
>> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make the
>> > renaming, but all in the branch.
>> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we can
>> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that time I
>> > could ask you and see what we can't do
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>> >
>> > > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the
>> next
>> > > release?
>> > >
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> > Rovira"
>> > > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the
>> > real
>> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for
>> > > >vivid,
>> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and
>> make
>> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set
>> > > >could
>> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown
>> (like
>> > > >the
>> > > >one in our Royale logo).
>> > > >
>> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example
>> we'll
>> > be
>> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
>> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
>> > > >
>> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the
>> > code
>> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
>> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people know we
>> > work
>> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
>> > > >
>> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
>> > > >
>> > > >Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >--
>> > > >Carlos Rovira
>> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
>> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
>> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
>> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Piotr,
thanks! :), don't worry I can wait for you to come, I can still be
preparing the "scenario" so when you come is all more easy to collaborate
:).
Regarding names and namespace, I'm a great advocate that these things
matters, I know people can use different prefixes if they want, but in the
end, 99% of the people will use what we put on place. The same as people
using spark in flex ends writing <s:Button/>.
but Anyway, I want to know that these change was ok with you all, and as
well notify before making changes suddenly in git about this.
Thanks! :)
2018-03-02 20:50 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something awesome and I
> can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
>
> Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that. User can
> have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have this
> one:
>
> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could also
> change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in my app.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a branch, I
> > think all this work will no affect that.
> > My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make the
> > renaming, but all in the branch.
> > Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we can
> > merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that time I
> > could ask you and see what we can't do
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the next
> > > release?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > Rovira"
> > > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the
> > real
> > > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for
> > > >vivid,
> > > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and
> make
> > > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set
> > > >could
> > > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown
> (like
> > > >the
> > > >one in our Royale logo).
> > > >
> > > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example
> we'll
> > be
> > > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
> > > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> > > >
> > > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the
> > code
> > > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
> > > >things that wire all together are as well important so people know we
> > work
> > > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> > > >
> > > >Let me know what do you think about it
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Carlos Rovira
> > > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> > > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> > > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > 7C636556155398287246&s
> > > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carlos,
First of all - Great job! :) You are again creating something awesome and I
can't wait to join you with help. Still many things holds me off. :)
Some thought about the namespace, I would not bother about that. User can
have different namespace if they want. In the other words I can have this
one:
xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" but I think I could also
change it to xmlns:basic="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic" in my app.
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-03-02 20:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a branch, I
> think all this work will no affect that.
> My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make the
> renaming, but all in the branch.
> Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we can
> merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that time I
> could ask you and see what we can't do
>
>
>
> 2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the next
> > release?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira"
> > <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the
> real
> > >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for
> > >vivid,
> > >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and make
> > >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set
> > >could
> > >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown (like
> > >the
> > >one in our Royale logo).
> > >
> > >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example we'll
> be
> > >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
> > >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> > >
> > >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the
> code
> > >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
> > >things that wire all together are as well important so people know we
> work
> > >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> > >
> > >Let me know what do you think about it
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >
> > >--
> > >Carlos Rovira
> > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> > >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> > >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636556155398287246&s
> > >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Alex,
don't want to disturb the new release, and as I'm working on a branch, I
think all this work will no affect that.
My plan is to make some real work first, and maybe this weekend make the
renaming, but all in the branch.
Maybe, if I get a component or two that looks final in this days, we can
merge in develop before you cut the release. In that case at that time I
could ask you and see what we can't do
2018-03-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the next
> release?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the real
> >tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for
> >vivid,
> >and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and make
> >starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set
> >could
> >be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown (like
> >the
> >one in our Royale logo).
> >
> >In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example we'll be
> >writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
> >simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
> >
> >I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the code
> >things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
> >things that wire all together are as well important so people know we work
> >all from various sides and try to get the best.
> >
> >Let me know what do you think about it
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
> >8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636556155398287246&s
> >data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: "Vivid" to become "Jewel"
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Sounds ok to me. Are you going to try to do that for 0.9.2 or the next
release?
-Alex
On 3/2/18, 11:25 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>now that we solved part of the technical problems to start making the real
>tasks to skin the components, I was thinking in the main concept for
>vivid,
>and think the name is not right. I take that to avoid thinking and make
>starting to work on this, but now I think a best name for this UI set
>could
>be "Jewel", as one of the precious stones use to decorate a crown (like
>the
>one in our Royale logo).
>
>In the other hand the namespace prefix will be "j" so for example we'll be
>writing "<j:Button/> that could recall to js and javascript, but more
>simple since a think only one letter is very good ;)
>
>I know this is maybe a little thing, and maybe more "a side" from the code
>things we use to handle, but I always think that concepts and all the
>things that wire all together are as well important so people know we work
>all from various sides and try to get the best.
>
>Let me know what do you think about it
>
>Thanks!
>
>--
>Carlos Rovira
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
>Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf1c486d4090b477ecee608d5
>8073612d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636556155398287246&s
>data=khkjgr%2BzQu7%2BoLiu43Od2e9pR6yOJ%2BEQFqI0b97Io4w%3D&reserved=0