You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/07 00:34:40 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3622) separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3622:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-3622.patch

patch, will look kinda wierd due to svn moves (thats all i did).

DirectSource, IndexDocValues, MultiIndexDocValues, PerDocFieldValues, SourceCache, TypePromoter, and ValueType stayed as the 'abstract' api and everything else moved to Lucene40Codec.

                
> separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3622.patch
>
>
> Currently the o.a.l.index.values contains both the abstract apis and Lucene40's current implementation.
> I think we should move the implementation underneath Lucene40Codec, leaving only the abstract apis.
> For example, simpletext might have a different implementation, and we might make a int8 implementation
> underneath preflexcodec to support norms.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org