You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> on 2006/08/11 10:26:49 UTC
Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Hello,
Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
are several things wrong/missing with this:
* jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
* version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
* it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
Thanks and best regards
Franz
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de>.
First thanks and second i would like to apologize, if my mail was too harsh.
Franz
Carlos Sanchez schrieb:
> The reference API is under javax.xml.bind in
> http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/bind/ and sun implementation
> under com.sun.xml.bind
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> I am not interested in "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind", i am only
>> interested in a working (and current) Maven2/JAXB2 combination (and a
>> fix for MNG-2305).
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>> Wayne Fay schrieb:
>> > You should probably file the "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind"
>> > issue on JIRA under MEV if you actually expect someone to "fix" it.
>> >
>> > Otherwise its just lots of talk on the Users list...
>> >
>> > Wayne
>> >
>> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
>> >> java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
>> >> error
>> >> (Rails)) .
>> >> I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Greetings
>> >>
>> >> Franz
>> >>
>> >> Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
>> >> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
>> >> com.sun --
>> >> but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun
>> internal;
>> >> whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution
>> >> would be if
>> >> there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive;
>> >> instead
>> >> of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers
>> >> it to
>> >> java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
>> >>
>> >> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Malachi
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> >> > Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a
>> mail
>> >> > sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
>> >> > .
>> >> > .
>> >> > .
>> >> >
>> >> > Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
>> >> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
>> >>
>> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
>>
>> >>
>> >> > .
>> >> > .
>> >> > .
>> >> >
>> >> > Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit
>> behind a
>> >> > proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
>> >> first
>> >> > proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
>> >> > Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access
>> https
>> >> > sites with maven2.
>> >> >
>> >> > Greetings
>> >> >
>> >> > Franz
>> >> >
>> >> > Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
>> >> > > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
>> >> per the
>> >> > > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
>> >> > > ibilio -- I
>> >> > > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
>> >> > > Databinding?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Malachi
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Hello,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
>> >> Maven2?
>> >> > >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are
>> >> jaxb-api jaxb-impl
>> >> > >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
>> >> > >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
>> >> there
>> >> > >> are
>> >> > >> several things wrong/missing with this:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>> >> > >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the
>> meantime.
>> >> > >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
>> >> > >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Thanks and best regards
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Franz
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
The reference API is under javax.xml.bind in
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/bind/ and sun implementation
under com.sun.xml.bind
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> I am not interested in "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind", i am only
> interested in a working (and current) Maven2/JAXB2 combination (and a
> fix for MNG-2305).
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
>
> Wayne Fay schrieb:
> > You should probably file the "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind"
> > issue on JIRA under MEV if you actually expect someone to "fix" it.
> >
> > Otherwise its just lots of talk on the Users list...
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
> >> java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
> >> error
> >> (Rails)) .
> >> I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
> >>
> >>
> >> Greetings
> >>
> >> Franz
> >>
> >> Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> >> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
> >> com.sun --
> >> but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal;
> >> whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
> >>
> >> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution
> >> would be if
> >> there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive;
> >> instead
> >> of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers
> >> it to
> >> java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
> >>
> >> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
> >>
> >>
> >> Malachi
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> >> > Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> >> > sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
> >> > .
> >> > .
> >> > .
> >> >
> >> > Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
> >> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
> >> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> >>
> >> > .
> >> > .
> >> > .
> >> >
> >> > Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
> >> > proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
> >> first
> >> > proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> >> > Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> >> > sites with maven2.
> >> >
> >> > Greetings
> >> >
> >> > Franz
> >> >
> >> > Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> >> > > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
> >> per the
> >> > > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> >> > > ibilio -- I
> >> > > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
> >> > >
> >> > > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> >> > > Databinding?
> >> > >
> >> > > Malachi
> >> > >
> >> > > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Hello,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
> >> Maven2?
> >> > >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are
> >> jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> >> > >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> >> > >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
> >> there
> >> > >> are
> >> > >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> >> > >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> >> > >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> >> > >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks and best regards
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Franz
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de>.
I am not interested in "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind", i am only
interested in a working (and current) Maven2/JAXB2 combination (and a
fix for MNG-2305).
Greetings
Franz
Wayne Fay schrieb:
> You should probably file the "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind"
> issue on JIRA under MEV if you actually expect someone to "fix" it.
>
> Otherwise its just lots of talk on the Users list...
>
> Wayne
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
>> java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
>> error
>> (Rails)) .
>> I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
>>
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Franz
>>
>> Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
>> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
>> com.sun --
>> but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal;
>> whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
>>
>> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution
>> would be if
>> there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive;
>> instead
>> of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers
>> it to
>> java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
>>
>> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
>>
>>
>> Malachi
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> > Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
>> > sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> >
>> > Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
>> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
>> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
>>
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> >
>> > Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
>> > proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
>> first
>> > proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
>> > Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
>> > sites with maven2.
>> >
>> > Greetings
>> >
>> > Franz
>> >
>> > Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
>> > > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
>> per the
>> > > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
>> > > ibilio -- I
>> > > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
>> > >
>> > > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
>> > > Databinding?
>> > >
>> > > Malachi
>> > >
>> > > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
>> Maven2?
>> > >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are
>> jaxb-api jaxb-impl
>> > >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
>> > >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
>> there
>> > >> are
>> > >> several things wrong/missing with this:
>> > >>
>> > >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>> > >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
>> > >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
>> > >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>> > >>
>> > >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks and best regards
>> > >>
>> > >> Franz
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Wayne Fay <wa...@gmail.com>.
You should probably file the "javax.xml instead of java.xml.bind"
issue on JIRA under MEV if you actually expect someone to "fix" it.
Otherwise its just lots of talk on the Users list...
Wayne
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>
>
> IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
> java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application error
> (Rails)) .
> I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
> Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of com.sun --
> but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal;
> whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
>
> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would be if
> there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive; instead
> of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers it to
> java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
>
> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
>
>
> Malachi
>
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> > Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> > sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
> > .
> > .
> > .
> >
> > Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> > .
> > .
> > .
> >
> > Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
> > proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first
> > proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> > Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> > sites with maven2.
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > Franz
> >
> > Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> > > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the
> > > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> > > ibilio -- I
> > > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
> > >
> > > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> > > Databinding?
> > >
> > > Malachi
> > >
> > > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
> > >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are
> jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> > >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> > >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
> > >> are
> > >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> > >>
> > >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> > >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> > >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> > >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> > >>
> > >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks and best regards
> > >>
> > >> Franz
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de>.
IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
error (Rails)) .
I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
> Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
> com.sun -- but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for
> Sun internal; whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
>
> Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would
> be if there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net
> <http://java.net> archive; instead of maintaining seperate copies...?
> Or for whatever process delivers it to java.net <http://java.net> to
> deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
>
> BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
>
>
> Malachi
>
>
> On 8/11/06, *Franz Fehringer* <feh@isogmbh.de <ma...@isogmbh.de>>
> wrote:
>
> Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com
> <ma...@Elsag-Solutions.com> in mind saying
> .
> .
> .
>
> Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
> "com.sun.xml" only. See also
> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> <http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry>
> .
> .
> .
>
> Hosting at java.net <http://java.net> is not appropriate for me,
> because i sit behind a
> proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
> first
> proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> sites with maven2.
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
> Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
> > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
> per the
> > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> > ibilio -- I
> > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net
> <http://java.net>?
> >
> > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> > Databinding?
> >
> > Malachi
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < feh@isogmbh.de
> <ma...@isogmbh.de>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
> Maven2?
> >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api
> jaxb-impl
> >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
> there
> >> are
> >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> >>
> >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> >>
> >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> >>
> >> Thanks and best regards
> >>
> >> Franz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> <ma...@jaxb.dev.java.net>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> <ma...@jaxb.dev.java.net>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> <ma...@jaxb.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> <ma...@jaxb.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Malachi de Ælfweald <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of com.sun --
but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal;
whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would be if
there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive; instead
of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers it to
java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
Malachi
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>
> Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
> .
> .
> .
>
> Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and "
> com.sun.xml" only. See also
> http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> .
> .
> .
>
> Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
> proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first
> proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> sites with maven2.
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
> Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the
> > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> > ibilio -- I
> > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
> >
> > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> > Databinding?
> >
> > Malachi
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
> >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api
> jaxb-impl
> >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
> >> are
> >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> >>
> >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> >>
> >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> >>
> >> Thanks and best regards
> >>
> >> Franz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de>.
Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
sent by Joerg.Schaible@Elsag-Solutions.com in mind saying
.
.
.
Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and "com.sun.xml" only. See also http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
.
.
.
Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first
proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
sites with maven2.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de �lfweald schrieb:
> We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the
> website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> ibilio -- I
> thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
>
> Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> Databinding?
>
> Malachi
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
>> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
>> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
>> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
>> are
>> several things wrong/missing with this:
>>
>> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
>> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
>> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>>
>> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>>
>> Thanks and best regards
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Malachi de Ælfweald <ma...@gmail.com>.
We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the
website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto ibilio -- I
thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
Databinding?
Malachi
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <fe...@isogmbh.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there are
> several things wrong/missing with this:
>
> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>
> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>
> Thanks and best regards
>
> Franz
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@jaxb.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@jaxb.dev.java.net
>
>
>
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
Kohsuke is right, although old stuff may be under javax.xml and
com.sun.xml we see better fit under javax.xml.something and as they
manage com.sun.* they can do however they want there (and we are not
involved in this later case).
On 8/11/06, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Ko...@sun.com> wrote:
> Franz Fehringer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
> > In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> > jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> > Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
> > are several things wrong/missing with this:
>
> We arranged a mirroring from java.net repo to the maven repo, so that's
> why we started seeing jars in ibiblio.
>
> > * jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>
> They are there: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/
>
> > * version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
>
> Yeah, I have to ask them why those new jars are not mirrored.
>
> > * it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> > javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>
> I really think it should be javax/xml/bind. There's no single group that
> is in charge of "javax.xml" packge at JCP. It's individual JSRs that
> own individual packages like "javax.xml.bind" and "javax.xml.ws". They
> follow different development models, release cycles, etc. So the group
> name should better reflect that structure.
>
> We kept JAX-RPC API in "javax.xml" to honor the backward compatibility,
> but for new jars, I'm not sure why we need to continue that way. I
> thought the Maven folks are in agreement with this, as you can see in
> http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/bind/
>
> The same can be said with "com.sun.xml", and I can make even stronger
> case here. Sun clearly owns this namespace, and so I thought the group
> in Sun that does "com.sun.xml" stuff gets to choose whatever conventions
> we see fit. Again, it's the same deal with javax.xml here --- there are
> individual groups that work on "com.sun.xml.bind" and
> "com.sun.xml.registry" and so on, and so it made more sense to us for
> each team to own its groupId.
>
> There's also no backward compatibility issue in "com.sun.xml.*", as this
> is the first time we publish any artifacts into these group Ids, unlike
> "javax.xml". So I don't understand why people are objecting to
> "com.sun.xml.bind" group id. What is the problem of this group id?
>
> --
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com
>
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven2 versus JAXB2 (on ibiblio)
Posted by Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Ko...@Sun.COM>.
Franz Fehringer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2?
> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there
> are several things wrong/missing with this:
We arranged a mirroring from java.net repo to the maven repo, so that's
why we started seeing jars in ibiblio.
> * jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
They are there: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/
> * version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
Yeah, I have to ask them why those new jars are not mirrored.
> * it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
I really think it should be javax/xml/bind. There's no single group that
is in charge of "javax.xml" packge at JCP. It's individual JSRs that
own individual packages like "javax.xml.bind" and "javax.xml.ws". They
follow different development models, release cycles, etc. So the group
name should better reflect that structure.
We kept JAX-RPC API in "javax.xml" to honor the backward compatibility,
but for new jars, I'm not sure why we need to continue that way. I
thought the Maven folks are in agreement with this, as you can see in
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/bind/
The same can be said with "com.sun.xml", and I can make even stronger
case here. Sun clearly owns this namespace, and so I thought the group
in Sun that does "com.sun.xml" stuff gets to choose whatever conventions
we see fit. Again, it's the same deal with javax.xml here --- there are
individual groups that work on "com.sun.xml.bind" and
"com.sun.xml.registry" and so on, and so it made more sense to us for
each team to own its groupId.
There's also no backward compatibility issue in "com.sun.xml.*", as this
is the first time we publish any artifacts into these group Ids, unlike
"javax.xml". So I don't understand why people are objecting to
"com.sun.xml.bind" group id. What is the problem of this group id?
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com