[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2980) Repackage org.apache.activemq.gbean.* into org.apache.geronimo.activemq.*

["Jason Dillon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481985 ] 

Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2980:
----------------------------------------

Should also renamed the activemq modules at this time too:

 * configs/activemq -> configs/activemq-ra
 * modules/geronimo-activemq-gbean -> modules/geronimo-activemq
 * modules/geronimo-activemq-gbean-management -> modules/geronimo-activemq-management

I always get confused about the configs/activemq... its really the resource adapter configuration.  And IMO its irrelevant to have 'gbean' in our module names.

> Repackage org.apache.activemq.gbean.* into org.apache.geronimo.activemq.*
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2980
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2980
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: ActiveMQ
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Jason Dillon
>         Assigned To: Jason Dillon
>
> Currently the ActiveMQ integration components use the package {{org.apache.activemq.gbean}}.  These are classes _in_ the Geronimo project and should be in the {{org.apache.geronimo.activemq}} package.
> This affects these modules:
>  * geronimo-activemq-gbean-management
>  * geronimo-activemq-gbean
>  * activemq-broker (config)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.