You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Ola Berg <ol...@ports.se> on 2002/11/22 09:08:46 UTC
[util] Hasher?
Subject line says it all. Now that it seems like we are getting ourselves a [util] package, maybe Hasher belongs there (after all, Random went into java.util).
/O
> [lang] already has a HashCodeBuilder that copes with generating fairly
> ordinary cases. Are specialised hashcodes really that useful?
> Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [util] Hasher?
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
+1 for [util]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ola Berg" <ol...@ports.se>
Subject line says it all. Now that it seems like we are getting ourselves a
[util] package, maybe Hasher belongs there (after all, Random went into
java.util).
/O
> [lang] already has a HashCodeBuilder that copes with generating fairly
> ordinary cases. Are specialised hashcodes really that useful?
> Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>