You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@turbine.apache.org by Maciej Leks <ml...@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl> on 2002/04/24 14:20:42 UTC

migration to T2.2b1 questions

Hi All,

   I am developing a big commercial application based on TDK2.1 for
Association of Polish Architects (in short SARP)...The app is almost
done! On the basis of this application I must in the very short time
(2 weeks) build template engine for managing of any associations that
can be easily extended.

I intend to develop this engine on Turbine 2.2, Fulcrum,
Torque...But this approach cause many problems, because saying
that Turbine 2.2(b1) is using decouple Fulcrum is exaggerated, I
think!

My questions:

1) Did you manage to take advantage of Fulcrum in the T 2.2b1?
2) How did you made this?
3) Is replacing turbine services with Fulcrum services sufficient?

Thank for any help!

Best regards!
______________________________________
 Leksiu (mleks@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl)


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: migration to T2.2b1 questions

Posted by Eric Dobbs <er...@dobbse.net>.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 06:20  AM, Maciej Leks wrote:

>    I am developing a big commercial application based on TDK2.1 for
> Association of Polish Architects (in short SARP)...The app is almost
> done! On the basis of this application I must in the very short time
> (2 weeks) build template engine for managing of any associations that
> can be easily extended.
>
> I intend to develop this engine on Turbine 2.2, Fulcrum,
> Torque...But this approach cause many problems, because saying
> that Turbine 2.2(b1) is using decouple Fulcrum is exaggerated, I
> think!


If your time frame is 2 weeks, I would suggest you stick
with 2.1.  More details are here:
<http://nagoya.apache.org:8080/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=turbine-
user@jakarta.apache.org&msgNo=3471>

You can probably use the 2.2 jars with your 2.1 app, but
I would be careful about migrating parts of your system
to using the decoupled code.

Right now you cannot just replace turbine services with
Fulcrum's.  Some parts of turbine are still coupled to
the old services.

Several things have changed since I wrote that message.
A number of things that used to be in Stratum have moved
to commons.  The recent fulcrum builds therefore require
a recent stratum build and a few items from commons.

Good luck!
-Eric

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>