Re: [sa-list] Re: DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?

[Rakesh <ra...@netcore.co.in>]

Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:

>but if you
>        plan on running this on a production system with live users, it
>        is a death wish."
>
>  
>
Death Wish ! I really don't think so. I run SpamAssassin+Razor+URI 
checks and a good amount of rulesets with MailScanner, all written in 
PERL on production system processing about a million messages a day for 
about 120 virtual domains and three virus scanners. And the load on my 
system never crosses 0.8, so I would never believe that SpamAssassin is 
a death wish for a production system, just because some one with a  
system with low RAM and uncessary processes running says so. Infact 
SpamAssassin has saved my life from irritating client complains about 
spams.

>I can not code anything like that myself. I am just (l)user. 
>  
>
I think users who cannot code shouldn't boss the developers of what to 
do and what not do. Atleast we should write a few lines to thank them 
that they spend so much of their and spend so much efforts for no pay. 
Even I am user and I really thank them a lot for the great work that 
they are doing.

>
>I reiterate: It does not hurt, if we try out and see what happens.
>
>  
>
Trying out new stuff is always a good suggestion, but the attitude of 
suggestion always matters a lot

-- 
Regards, 
Rakesh B. Pal
Emergic CleanMail Team.
Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

==================================================================
perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
==================================================================



----------------------------------------------------------
Netcore's New Website
http://www.netcore.co.in
----------------------------------------------------------