You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2008/04/05 02:51:45 UTC
[VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the
itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything
looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at
the finish line.
If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the
best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next
week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of
limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
And now... the binaries ....!
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
Here's my +1
Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
-David
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
Regards
Jon
David Blevins wrote:
> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
> early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the
> itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything
> looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at
> the finish line.
>
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the
> best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next
> week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of
> limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
>
> And now... the binaries ....!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1 - Great work!
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 4, 2008, at 5:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
> early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run
> the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and
> everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it
> seems we're at the finish line.
>
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the
> best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next
> week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of
> limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
>
> And now... the binaries ....!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
+1 (Continuum build looks fine as well)
David Blevins wrote:
> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
> early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the
> itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything looks
> good there as well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at the
> finish line.
>
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the best
> game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next week. The
> 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of limitations and
> bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
>
> And now... the binaries ....!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>
> -David
>
Re: [RESULTS] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:42 AM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> OpenEJB 3.0 is now officially final!!!
Huuuray! Congrats to the release manager - Dave - for his fantastic
patience and bug-hunting.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
[RESULTS] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Vote passed with 13 +1s and no other votes.
+1s:
Alan D. Cabrera
Alexander Saint Croix
Dain Sundstrom
Daniel S. Haischt
David Blevins
David Jencks
Jacek Laskowski
Jeff Genender
Joe Bohn
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Kevan Miller
Manu George
OpenEJB 3.0 is now officially final!!!
-David
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 7, 2008, at 1:58 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/
>> openejb-3.0 needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is
>> mandatory, IMO.
>
> +1. Thanks, David!
>
>> The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the
>> maven-remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should
>> only contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list
>> of dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as
>> the NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would
>> say this is probably a decision for the PMC.
>
> A project decision, definitely. I encourage everyone to update
> their votes if they feel they need to.
>
> Any thoughts on resolution either for this or future releases?
I think Dave Jencks and Jason Dillon have done a real nice job of
integrating the m-r-r-p into some Geronimo sub-projects. Dependency
info (currently in your notice file) is created instead. There's no
fully-automated process for generating proper NOTICE files, at least
to my knowledge. However, since most notice files in an Apache project
only need to contain copyright information for the project. You can
hit most cases with a simple attribution and manage the non-standard
cases manually. It's still not an easy process...
>
>
>> The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a
>> license/notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts
>> should be reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment,
>> but recall noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm connected
>> again...
>
> Thanks!
>
>> The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/
>> oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll fix on
>> trunk...
>
> Great. Merged that into our branch.
>
>
> Given the legal tweaks, I think the best course of action is to
> extend the vote out another 2 days (i.e. ending 72 hours from now).
> If someone wants to rescind or change their vote, they'll have time.
>
> Thanks, Kevan!
I won't have a chance to work on any of this until later today (might
be as late as tomorrow morning).
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
Regards
Manu
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1 :-)
--kevan
On Apr 10, 2008, at 6:26 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>>
>> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they
>> are new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would
>> like to rescind or change their vote they can.
>
> Looks like we still had some LICENSE/NOTICE issues with our
> standalone and tomcat webapp binaries (thank you Kevan for helping
> to track these down). I've updated the following zips/tars with new
> LICENSE/NOTICE files, all binaries inside the jar are still the same
> as the previous version sans the openejb.war which no longer
> contains junit (never should have):
>
> openejb-3.0-src.tar.gz
> openejb-3.0-src.zip
> openejb-3.0.tar.gz
> openejb-3.0.zip
> openejb.war
>
> Once again pushing out the close date of the vote to give people
> time to review the new NOTICE/LICENSE files. Will call the vote to
> close on Saturday.
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
david jencks
On Apr 10, 2008, at 3:26 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>>
>> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they
>> are new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would
>> like to rescind or change their vote they can.
>
> Looks like we still had some LICENSE/NOTICE issues with our
> standalone and tomcat webapp binaries (thank you Kevan for helping
> to track these down). I've updated the following zips/tars with
> new LICENSE/NOTICE files, all binaries inside the jar are still the
> same as the previous version sans the openejb.war which no longer
> contains junit (never should have):
>
> openejb-3.0-src.tar.gz
> openejb-3.0-src.zip
> openejb-3.0.tar.gz
> openejb-3.0.zip
> openejb.war
>
> Once again pushing out the close date of the vote to give people
> time to review the new NOTICE/LICENSE files. Will call the vote to
> close on Saturday.
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>
> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they
> are new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would
> like to rescind or change their vote they can.
Looks like we still had some LICENSE/NOTICE issues with our standalone
and tomcat webapp binaries (thank you Kevan for helping to track these
down). I've updated the following zips/tars with new LICENSE/NOTICE
files, all binaries inside the jar are still the same as the previous
version sans the openejb.war which no longer contains junit (never
should have):
openejb-3.0-src.tar.gz
openejb-3.0-src.zip
openejb-3.0.tar.gz
openejb-3.0.zip
openejb.war
Once again pushing out the close date of the vote to give people time
to review the new NOTICE/LICENSE files. Will call the vote to close
on Saturday.
-David
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
+1
Joe Bohn
David Blevins wrote:
> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>
> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they are
> new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would like to
> rescind or change their vote they can.
>
> -David
>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
I tested the following binaries:
OpenEJB Standalone
Tomcat 6.0.14
Tomcat 6.0.13
Tomcat 6.0.10
Tomcat 6.0.9
Tomcat 5.5.26
Tomcat 5.5.25
Tomcat 5.5.23
Tomcat 5.5.20
on the following platforms:
OSX JDK 1.5
OSX JDK 1.6
Windows JDK 1.5
Windows JDK 1.6
Tomcat was tested before and after running the installer.
Test logs can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~dain/stage/
-dain
On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>
> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they
> are new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would
> like to rescind or change their vote they can.
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
wrote:
> Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
>
> Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they are new
> we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would like to rescind
> or change their vote they can.
>
> -David
>
>
--
Karan Singh Malhi
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Alright, I've rolled new binaries with the updated legal work.
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage2/
Functionally the same as the previous set of binaries, but as they are
new we'll extend the vote out till Thursday so if anyone would like to
rescind or change their vote they can.
-David
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:02 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've updated trunk to include appropriate LICENSE and NOTICE files
> at the checkout root (rev 645721 ) and to use the latest maven-
> remote-resources-plugin and resource bundle (rev 645784). The
> single appended-resources directory does not strike me as a good
> idea (although I may have suggested it).
Thanks, I've merged the LICENSE and NOTICE files over to the branch.
> I'm also not convinced it is completely accurate (jdom license is
> not apache, jmdns is not an apache project and has some apparently
> LGPL classes in the jar)
Fortunately we don't need jmdns. We had an exclude on it for the
activemq-core dep, but it looks like it crept in via activemq-ra.
Added an exclude there too.
-David
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've updated trunk to include appropriate LICENSE and NOTICE files at the
> checkout root (rev 645721 ) and to use the latest
> maven-remote-resources-plugin and resource bundle (rev 645784). The single
> appended-resources directory does not strike me as a good idea (although I
> may have suggested it). I'm also not convinced it is completely accurate
> (jdom license is not apache, jmdns is not an apache project and has some
> apparently LGPL classes in the jar)
Does it mean we're done with the legal "goo" for 3.0 at least?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I've updated trunk to include appropriate LICENSE and NOTICE files at
the checkout root (rev 645721 ) and to use the latest maven-remote-
resources-plugin and resource bundle (rev 645784). The single
appended-resources directory does not strike me as a good idea
(although I may have suggested it). I'm also not convinced it is
completely accurate (jdom license is not apache, jmdns is not an
apache project and has some apparently LGPL classes in the jar)
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 7, 2008, at 1:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> sorry for letting these legal goo questions drop off my radar. I
> can help fix problems a bit later today.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about whether we need to redo the
> vote to fix the generated NOTICE files. The current ones are
> definitely wrong and a lot of projects have released artifacts
> containing similarly wrong NOTICE files.
>
> I'll work on trunk to get the generation up to par and make sure
> the root svn files look OK....
>
> On Apr 6, 2008, at 10:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/
>>> openejb-3.0 needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is
>>> mandatory, IMO.
>>
>> +1. Thanks, David!
>>
>>> The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the
>>> maven-remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should
>>> only contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list
>>> of dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as
>>> the NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would
>>> say this is probably a decision for the PMC.
>>
>> A project decision, definitely. I encourage everyone to update
>> their votes if they feel they need to.
>>
>> Any thoughts on resolution either for this or future releases?
>>
>>> The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a
>>> license/notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts
>>> should be reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment,
>>> but recall noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm
>>> connected again...
>
> The maven-remote-resources-plugin seems to like to put the files in
> wars in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/LICENSE. The only way I've found
> to get them in META-INF is to include them as hardcoded resources
> in webapp.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/
>>> jee/oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll
>>> fix on trunk...
>>
>> Great. Merged that into our branch.
>>
>>
>> Given the legal tweaks, I think the best course of action is to
>> extend the vote out another 2 days (i.e. ending 72 hours from
>> now). If someone wants to rescind or change their vote, they'll
>> have time.
>>
>> Thanks, Kevan!
>>
>> -David
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a
>>>> run early this morning and everything is running clean. I've
>>>> also run the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat
>>>> and everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or
>>>> so, it seems we're at the finish line.
>>>>
>>>> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think
>>>> the best game plan would be to still release this and get a
>>>> 3.0.1 next week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large
>>>> number of limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to
>>>> cover it up.
>>>>
>>>> And now... the binaries ....!
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
sorry for letting these legal goo questions drop off my radar. I can
help fix problems a bit later today.
I don't have a strong opinion about whether we need to redo the vote
to fix the generated NOTICE files. The current ones are definitely
wrong and a lot of projects have released artifacts containing
similarly wrong NOTICE files.
I'll work on trunk to get the generation up to par and make sure the
root svn files look OK....
On Apr 6, 2008, at 10:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/
>> openejb-3.0 needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is
>> mandatory, IMO.
>
> +1. Thanks, David!
>
>> The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the
>> maven-remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should
>> only contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list
>> of dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as
>> the NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would
>> say this is probably a decision for the PMC.
>
> A project decision, definitely. I encourage everyone to update
> their votes if they feel they need to.
>
> Any thoughts on resolution either for this or future releases?
>
>> The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a
>> license/notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts
>> should be reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment,
>> but recall noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm
>> connected again...
The maven-remote-resources-plugin seems to like to put the files in
wars in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/LICENSE. The only way I've found to
get them in META-INF is to include them as hardcoded resources in
webapp.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Thanks!
>
>> The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/
>> jee/oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll
>> fix on trunk...
>
> Great. Merged that into our branch.
>
>
> Given the legal tweaks, I think the best course of action is to
> extend the vote out another 2 days (i.e. ending 72 hours from
> now). If someone wants to rescind or change their vote, they'll
> have time.
>
> Thanks, Kevan!
>
> -David
>
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a
>>> run early this morning and everything is running clean. I've
>>> also run the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat
>>> and everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or
>>> so, it seems we're at the finish line.
>>>
>>> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think
>>> the best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1
>>> next week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number
>>> of limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover
>>> it up.
>>>
>>> And now... the binaries ....!
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Alexander Saint Croix <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1. Thanks to all of you guys--I'm looking forward to the upgrade!
Cheers,
--
Alex
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Apr 6, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/openejb-3.0
> needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is mandatory, IMO.
+1. Thanks, David!
> The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the
> maven-remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should
> only contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list of
> dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as the
> NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would say
> this is probably a decision for the PMC.
A project decision, definitely. I encourage everyone to update their
votes if they feel they need to.
Any thoughts on resolution either for this or future releases?
> The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a
> license/notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts
> should be reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment, but
> recall noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm connected
> again...
Thanks!
> The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/
> oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll fix on
> trunk...
Great. Merged that into our branch.
Given the legal tweaks, I think the best course of action is to extend
the vote out another 2 days (i.e. ending 72 hours from now). If
someone wants to rescind or change their vote, they'll have time.
Thanks, Kevan!
-David
>
> On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
>> early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run
>> the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and
>> everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it
>> seems we're at the finish line.
>>
>> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the
>> best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next
>> week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of
>> limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
>>
>> And now... the binaries ....!
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>>
>> -David
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
As David J noted a week or so back, the svn root at tags/openejb-3.0
needs to contain a LICENSE and NOTICE file. This is mandatory, IMO.
The NOTICE files in generated jar files, being created using the maven-
remote-resources-plugin, aren't proper. NOTICE files should only
contain legally required attributions, not a transitive list of
dependencies. IMO, they should be updated. However, as long as the
NOTICE files also contain the required attributions, I would say this
is probably a decision for the PMC.
The generated WAR file in openejb-itests-web did not contain a license/
notice file. The notice files for all itests artifacts should be
reviewed. I don't have internet access, at the moment, but recall
noticing a problem. Will take a look, once I'm connected again...
The file container/openejb-jee/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/jee/
oejb3/EjbLink.java has an incorrect src license header. I'll fix on
trunk...
--kevan
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:51 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run
> early this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run
> the itests on standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and
> everything looks good there as well. After three weeks or so, it
> seems we're at the finish line.
>
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the
> best game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next
> week. The 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of
> limitations and bugs. We need to get something out to cover it up.
>
> And now... the binaries ....!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>
> -David
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
+1
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> +1
>
> Jacek
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:51 AM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run early
>> this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the itests on
>> standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything looks good there as
>> well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at the finish line.
>>
>> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the best
>> game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next week. The
>> 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of limitations and bugs.
>> We need to get something out to cover it up.
>>
>> And now... the binaries ....!
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] OpenEJB 3.0 final (fingers crossed)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
+1
Jacek
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:51 AM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> All right. TCK issues were fixed last night. Joe kicked off a run early
> this morning and everything is running clean. I've also run the itests on
> standalone and a dozen versions of tomcat and everything looks good there as
> well. After three weeks or so, it seems we're at the finish line.
>
> If there does turn out to be an issue with this build, I think the best
> game plan would be to still release this and get a 3.0.1 next week. The
> 3.0-beta-2 release is good but has a large number of limitations and bugs.
> We need to get something out to cover it up.
>
> And now... the binaries ....!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/3.0/
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/repo/
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0/
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Happy voting!
>
> -David
>
>
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl