[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9340) ScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest may fail with Address already in use

["Ted Yu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16507191#comment-16507191 ] 

Ted Yu commented on FLINK-9340:
-------------------------------

I wonder if it is easier to reproduce the error when running LegacyScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest concurrently with this test.

> ScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest may fail with Address already in use
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9340
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When ScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest is run in the test suite, I saw:
> {code}
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 8.034 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmanager.scheduler.ScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest
> org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmanager.scheduler.ScheduleOrUpdateConsumersTest  Time elapsed: 8.034 sec  <<< ERROR!
> java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>   at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>   at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:433)
>   at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:425)
>   at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:223)
>   at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioServerSocketChannel.doBind(NioServerSocketChannel.java:125)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel$AbstractUnsafe.bind(AbstractChannel.java:485)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.bind(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1081)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeBind(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:502)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.bind(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:487)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.bind(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:904)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.AbstractChannel.bind(AbstractChannel.java:198)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.bootstrap.AbstractBootstrap$2.run(AbstractBootstrap.java:348)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:357)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:357)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$2.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:111)
>   at org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultThreadFactory.java:137)
> {code}
> Seems there was address / port conflict.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)