You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Feniks Nator <fe...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/31 19:21:47 UTC
running multiple instances of continuum on one machine
Hey,
I'm wondering if it is possible to run multiple instances of Continuum on
the same machine? We have a lot of projects (each possibly having one or
more modules), and this results in a long list of modules/projects. As far
as I know it's not (yet?) possible to filter the last based on name or
group.
So I was thinking about running a second instance of continuum listening on
another port.
What would be the best way to do this? We run on windows, continuum
installed as a service.
Duplicate the whole continuum installation and change the config in that
location to run on another port? Consequence of this is that the existing
users are lost.
Another solution is creating a second wrapper.config file. But I'm not sure
what will be the result. MAybe we'll encounter threading/concurrency issues.
Anyone already tried this out?
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Re: running multiple instances of continuum on one machine
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
yep
On 9/1/06, Feniks Nator <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "You only need to modify the port of http and xmlrpc services in
> apps/continuum/conf/application.xml"
>
> Probably a stupid question: so I install a second copy of continuum?
>
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: running multiple instances of continuum on one machine
Posted by Feniks Nator <fe...@gmail.com>.
"You only need to modify the port of http and xmlrpc services in
apps/continuum/conf/application.xml"
Probably a stupid question: so I install a second copy of continuum?
Re: running multiple instances of continuum on one machine
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
You only need to modify the port of http and xmlrpc services in apps/continuum/conf/application.xml
Emmanuel
L. J. a écrit :
> Yes, it is possible, we run 3 instances of Continuum on one AIX machine
> using different ports
>
> On 8/31/06, Feniks Nator <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I'm wondering if it is possible to run multiple instances of Continuum on
>> the same machine? We have a lot of projects (each possibly having one or
>> more modules), and this results in a long list of modules/projects. As
>> far
>> as I know it's not (yet?) possible to filter the last based on name or
>> group.
>> So I was thinking about running a second instance of continuum listening
>> on
>> another port.
>> What would be the best way to do this? We run on windows, continuum
>> installed as a service.
>> Duplicate the whole continuum installation and change the config in that
>> location to run on another port? Consequence of this is that the existing
>> users are lost.
>>
>> Another solution is creating a second wrapper.config file. But I'm not
>> sure
>> what will be the result. MAybe we'll encounter threading/concurrency
>> issues.
>>
>> Anyone already tried this out?
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>
Re: running multiple instances of continuum on one machine
Posted by "L. J." <ap...@gmail.com>.
Yes, it is possible, we run 3 instances of Continuum on one AIX machine
using different ports
On 8/31/06, Feniks Nator <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I'm wondering if it is possible to run multiple instances of Continuum on
> the same machine? We have a lot of projects (each possibly having one or
> more modules), and this results in a long list of modules/projects. As far
> as I know it's not (yet?) possible to filter the last based on name or
> group.
> So I was thinking about running a second instance of continuum listening
> on
> another port.
> What would be the best way to do this? We run on windows, continuum
> installed as a service.
> Duplicate the whole continuum installation and change the config in that
> location to run on another port? Consequence of this is that the existing
> users are lost.
>
> Another solution is creating a second wrapper.config file. But I'm not
> sure
> what will be the result. MAybe we'll encounter threading/concurrency
> issues.
>
> Anyone already tried this out?
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
>