You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@nifi.apache.org by dan young <da...@gmail.com> on 2020/02/25 16:17:52 UTC

what happen to the 1.11.2 download?

Hello,

I see the 1.11.2 download is not working, there's a 1.11.3 now.  Is there a
reason it was pulled and should we not be running it in production?

Regards,

Dano

Re: what happen to the 1.11.2 download?

Posted by dan young <da...@gmail.com>.
OK, great thank you.....yes, will need that...thank you!

Dano

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:24 AM Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dano
>
> You can obtain Apache NiFi 1.11.2 from the archives if you need it.
>
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/nifi/1.11.2/
>
> We released Apache NiFi 1.11.3 last night and I'll send an email on that
> later today (waiting for mirrors to catch up).
>
> The primary push for 1.11.3 was to resolve a resource leak in the
> distributed map cache mechanism which is popular as it is used by
> DetectDuplicate.  If you're using that you'll want to grab 1.11.3.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:18 AM dan young <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see the 1.11.2 download is not working, there's a 1.11.3 now.  Is there
>> a reason it was pulled and should we not be running it in production?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dano
>>
>

Re: what happen to the 1.11.2 download?

Posted by Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com>.
Dano

You can obtain Apache NiFi 1.11.2 from the archives if you need it.

http://archive.apache.org/dist/nifi/1.11.2/

We released Apache NiFi 1.11.3 last night and I'll send an email on that
later today (waiting for mirrors to catch up).

The primary push for 1.11.3 was to resolve a resource leak in the
distributed map cache mechanism which is popular as it is used by
DetectDuplicate.  If you're using that you'll want to grab 1.11.3.

Thanks



On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:18 AM dan young <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I see the 1.11.2 download is not working, there's a 1.11.3 now.  Is there
> a reason it was pulled and should we not be running it in production?
>
> Regards,
>
> Dano
>