You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Stephen O'Donnell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/21 20:41:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15250) Setting
`dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname` to true can crash the system because of
unhandled UnresolvedAddressException
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17326902#comment-17326902 ]
Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDFS-15250:
------------------------------------------
I am reviewing some backports and came across this one. The change here does not seem to fix anything as a couple of people have stated. Has anyone got a stack trace from an occurrence of this error so we can see where it fails exactly?
> Setting `dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname` to true can crash the system because of unhandled UnresolvedAddressException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-15250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15250
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ctest
> Assignee: Ctest
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.2.2, 3.3.1, 3.4.0, 3.1.5
>
> Attachments: HDFS-15250-001.patch, HDFS-15250-002.patch
>
>
> *Problem:*
> `dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname` by default is set to false, which means the client will use the IP address of the datanode to connect to the datanode, rather than the hostname of the datanode.
> In `org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.client.impl.BlockReaderFactory.nextTcpPeer`:
>
> {code:java}
> try {
> Peer peer = remotePeerFactory.newConnectedPeer(inetSocketAddress, token,
> datanode);
> LOG.trace("nextTcpPeer: created newConnectedPeer {}", peer);
> return new BlockReaderPeer(peer, false);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> LOG.trace("nextTcpPeer: failed to create newConnectedPeer connected to"
> + "{}", datanode);
> throw e;
> }
> {code}
>
> If `dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname` is false, then it will try to connect via IP address. If the IP address is illegal and the connection fails, IOException will be thrown from `newConnectedPeer` and be handled.
> If `dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname` is true, then it will try to connect via hostname. If the hostname cannot be resolved, UnresolvedAddressException will be thrown from `newConnectedPeer`. However, UnresolvedAddressException is not a subclass of IOException so `nextTcpPeer` doesn’t handle this exception at all. This unhandled exception could crash the system.
>
> *Solution:*
> Since the method is handling the illegal IP address, then the illegal hostname should be also handled as well. One solution is to add the handling logic in `nextTcpPeer`:
> {code:java}
> } catch (IOException e) {
> LOG.trace("nextTcpPeer: failed to create newConnectedPeer connected to"
> + "{}", datanode);
> throw e;
> } catch (UnresolvedAddressException e) {
> ... // handling logic
> }{code}
> I am very happy to provide a patch to do this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org